PHG vs. AMAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Koninklijke Philips N.V. (PHG) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT).

Performance

PHG vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Koninklijke Philips N.V. (PHG) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PHG vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PHG Koninklijke Philips N.V.	1.18%	10.87%	8.53%	55.64%	-57.64%	-30.75%	11.00%	42.23%	-4.92%	26.32%
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc.	33.16%	59.60%	1.13%	67.97%	-37.54%	83.64%	43.29%	89.86%	-34.92%	59.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PHG : $26.47B AMAT : $273.09B
EPS PHG : $0.93 AMAT : $9.73
PE Ratio PHG : 29.46 AMAT : 35.13
PEG Ratio PHG : 15.29 AMAT : 4.47
PS Ratio PHG : 1.48 AMAT : 9.76
PB Ratio PHG : 2.42 AMAT : 12.57
Total Revenue (TTM) PHG : $17.83B AMAT : $28.21B
Gross Profit (TTM) PHG : $8.06B AMAT : $13.75B
EBITDA (TTM) PHG : $2.60B AMAT : $9.59B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHG achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 33.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PHG has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 1.66%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 33.40% annualized return.

PHG

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: -14.38%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 0.51%
• 1Y: 11.83%
• 3Y*: 15.68%
• 5Y*: -12.35%
• 10Y*: 1.66%

AMAT

• 1D: 5.78%
• 1M: -8.20%
• YTD: 33.16%
• 6M: 67.47%
• 1Y: 137.63%
• 3Y*: 41.87%
• 5Y*: 20.31%
• 10Y*: 33.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PHG vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHG

PHG Risk / Return Rank: 53
PHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
PHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PHG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
PHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
PHG Martin Ratio Rank: 58

AMAT

AMAT Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHG vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Koninklijke Philips N.V. (PHG) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHG	AMAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	2.82	-2.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	3.05	-2.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.43	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	6.44	-5.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.64	17.96	-16.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHG vs. AMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHG Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the AMAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHG and AMAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHG	AMAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	2.82	-2.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.33	0.47	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05	0.79	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.41	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between PHG and AMAT is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PHG vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

PHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than AMAT's 0.54% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PHG Koninklijke Philips N.V.	3.23%	3.27%	0.00%	0.00%	6.43%	2.80%	0.00%	1.97%	2.82%	2.02%	2.51%	2.98%
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc.	0.54%	0.69%	0.93%	0.75%	1.05%	0.60%	1.01%	1.36%	2.14%	0.78%	1.24%	2.14%

Drawdowns

PHG vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHG drawdown since its inception was -79.61%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHG and AMAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHG	AMAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.61%	-85.22%	+5.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.24%	-21.37%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-79.61%	-55.14%	-24.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.61%	-55.14%	-24.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.72%	-13.46%	-37.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.12%	-38.96%	+9.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.56%	7.67%	-1.11%

Volatility

PHG vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Koninklijke Philips N.V. (PHG) is 9.58%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 17.09%. This indicates that PHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHG	AMAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.58%	17.09%	-7.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.48%	34.94%	-13.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.53%	49.10%	-16.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.35%	43.28%	-5.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.91%	42.40%	-10.49%

Financials

PHG vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Koninklijke Philips N.V. and Applied Materials, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PHG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Koninklijke Philips N.V. reported a gross profit of 2.29B and revenue of 5.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.9%.

AMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.44B and revenue of 7.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

PHG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Koninklijke Philips N.V. reported an operating income of 540.00M and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

AMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.10B and revenue of 7.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.

PHG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Koninklijke Philips N.V. reported a net income of 395.00M and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.

AMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.03B and revenue of 7.01B, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.