PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PHG vs. AMAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PHG and AMAT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

PHG vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Koninklijke Philips N.V. (PHG) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20,000.00%40,000.00%60,000.00%80,000.00%100,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1,619.39%
70,565.23%
PHG
AMAT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PHG:

0.32

AMAT:

0.12

Sortino Ratio

PHG:

0.90

AMAT:

0.46

Omega Ratio

PHG:

1.13

AMAT:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

PHG:

0.20

AMAT:

0.14

Martin Ratio

PHG:

1.15

AMAT:

0.29

Ulcer Index

PHG:

11.37%

AMAT:

17.60%

Daily Std Dev

PHG:

40.46%

AMAT:

42.46%

Max Drawdown

PHG:

-79.52%

AMAT:

-85.22%

Current Drawdown

PHG:

-52.71%

AMAT:

-35.57%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PHG:

$25.38B

AMAT:

$138.60B

EPS

PHG:

-$0.51

AMAT:

$8.61

PEG Ratio

PHG:

0.36

AMAT:

1.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

PHG:

$18.04B

AMAT:

$27.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PHG:

$7.61B

AMAT:

$12.90B

EBITDA (TTM)

PHG:

$393.50M

AMAT:

$8.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHG achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than AMAT's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PHG has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 1.79%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 22.06% annualized return.


PHG

YTD

11.31%

1M

-4.56%

6M

-4.34%

1Y

13.45%

5Y*

-9.07%

10Y*

1.79%

AMAT

YTD

1.73%

1M

-3.82%

6M

-30.21%

1Y

2.15%

5Y*

22.67%

10Y*

22.06%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHG vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Koninklijke Philips N.V. (PHG) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHG, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.320.12
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHG, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.900.46
The chart of Omega ratio for PHG, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.131.06
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHG, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.200.14
The chart of Martin ratio for PHG, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.150.29
PHG
AMAT

The current PHG Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the AMAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHG and AMAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.32
0.12
PHG
AMAT

Dividends

PHG vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

PHG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PHG
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
0.00%0.00%6.95%3.03%1.87%2.17%3.11%2.52%3.18%3.94%4.17%2.93%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.93%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%1.61%2.21%

Drawdowns

PHG vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHG drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHG and AMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-52.71%
-35.57%
PHG
AMAT

Volatility

PHG vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Koninklijke Philips N.V. (PHG) is 5.47%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 9.90%. This indicates that PHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.47%
9.90%
PHG
AMAT

Financials

PHG vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Koninklijke Philips N.V. and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab