PH vs. KMB
PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, PH returned 25.12%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KMB. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PH vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 25.12%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.
PH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 39.33%
- 3Y*
- 36.33%
- 5Y*
- 26.12%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
PH vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 3.21% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PH and KMB is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.26 |
The correlation between PH and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (3 years) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PH:
$115.65B
KMB:
$34.08B
PH:
$27.11
KMB:
$5.93
PH:
33.33
KMB:
17.26
PH:
1.41
KMB:
2.98
PH:
5.53
KMB:
2.06
PH:
7.43
KMB:
18.98
PH:
$20.99B
KMB:
$16.54B
PH:
$7.81B
KMB:
$5.93B
PH:
$5.31B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PH vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
PH
KMB
PH vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PH | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.87 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | -0.67 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | -1.03 | +6.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PH vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PH | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -36.97% | -29.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -29.60% | +10.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.79% | -34.06% | +7.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -34.06% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.68% | -34.06% | -20.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.49% | -26.52% | +15.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -8.85% | -6.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.52% | 19.43% | -12.91% |
Volatility
PH vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 7.58%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PH | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 8.42% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.96% | 16.67% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.10% | 25.77% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 20.19% | +8.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.70% | 21.07% | +10.63% |
Dividends
PH vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than KMB's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.82% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
PH vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PH vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PH and KMB have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to PH (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs KMB's -36.97%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PH and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer