PH vs. KMB
PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, PH returned 25.97%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for KMB. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PH vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PH having a 11.56% return and KMB slightly lower at 11.19%. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 25.97%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.74% annualized return.
PH
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 34.58%
- 3Y*
- 34.53%
- 5Y*
- 27.26%
- 10Y*
- 25.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.99%
KMB
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- -7.99%
- 3Y*
- -1.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.50%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $325.44M | $393.74M | $451.43M | |
| $537.51M | $523.59M | $635.17M |
PH vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 11.56% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 11.19% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PH and KMB is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PH and KMB has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
PH:
$123.13B
KMB:
$36.28B
PH:
$27.15
KMB:
$5.93
PH:
35.96
KMB:
18.44
PH:
1.52
KMB:
3.19
PH:
5.96
KMB:
2.20
PH:
8.03
KMB:
20.28
PH:
$20.99B
KMB:
$16.54B
PH:
$7.81B
KMB:
$5.93B
PH:
$5.31B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PH vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
PH
KMB
PH vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PH | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.97 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | -0.27 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | -0.39 | +5.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PH vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PH | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -36.97% | -29.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -29.60% | +10.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.79% | -34.06% | +7.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -34.06% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.68% | -34.06% | -20.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -21.48% | +17.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.30% | -8.89% | -6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.85% | 20.31% | -13.46% |
Volatility
PH vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 6.43%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 8.53%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PH | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 8.53% | -2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.46% | 18.63% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.70% | 27.16% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.66% | 20.63% | +8.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.62% | 21.25% | +10.37% |
Dividends
PH vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than KMB's 4.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.65% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.76% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
PH vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PH vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PH and KMB have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to PH (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs KMB's -36.97%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PH and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer