PGVFX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
PGVFX is managed by Polaris Funds. It was launched on May 31, 1998. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
PGVFX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGVFX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund | 5.74% | 27.01% | 5.33% | 14.76% | -12.00% | 15.38% | 6.65% | 22.83% | -12.64% | 20.60% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGVFX achieves a 5.74% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PGVFX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 9.74%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
PGVFX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -6.45%
- YTD
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.74%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGVFX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGVFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGVFX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
PGVFX
FGIAX
PGVFX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGVFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.28 | 1.79 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.82 | 2.30 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.36 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 2.73 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.21 | 12.62 | -2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGVFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 1.79 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.80 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.58 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.42 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGVFX and FGIAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PGVFX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
PGVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund | 4.89% | 5.17% | 5.65% | 1.68% | 3.55% | 4.05% | 1.55% | 3.69% | 3.39% | 1.50% | 1.32% | 1.26% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
PGVFX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGVFX drawdown since its inception was -68.09%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGVFX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGVFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.09% | -49.35% | -18.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.65% | -8.29% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.58% | -21.08% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.26% | -38.02% | -3.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.68% | -3.06% | -4.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.36% | -7.22% | -4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 1.79% | +0.98% |
Volatility
PGVFX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that PGVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGVFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 4.15% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.36% | 7.07% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 12.28% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 13.08% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 15.17% | +0.65% |