PGRO vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PGRO (Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. PGRO is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PGRO returned 12.34%/yr vs 19.69%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PGRO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

PGRO vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGRO achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 23.07% return.

PGRO

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -1.49%
• YTD: 5.50%
• 6M: 4.90%
• 1Y: 20.73%
• 3Y*: 22.44%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -5.94%
• YTD: 23.07%
• 6M: 24.76%
• 1Y: 24.84%
• 3Y*: 28.26%
• 5Y*: 19.69%
• 10Y*: 11.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGRO vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF	5.50%	15.13%	34.01%	45.19%	-31.53%	16.63%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	23.07%	5.88%	42.17%	15.63%	17.48%	3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PGRO and ENFR is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021	0.28

The correlation between PGRO and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PGRO vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PGRO	ENFR
Technology	51.1%	-
Communication Services	12.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	-
Healthcare	7.8%	-
Financial Services	5.0%	0.1%
Industrials	4.4%	3.4%
Utilities	2.6%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	-
Basic Materials	2.3%	-
Real Estate	0.9%	-
Energy	-	98.5%

Return for Risk

PGRO vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGRO

PGRO Risk / Return Rank: 32
PGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
PGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
PGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
PGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
PGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 30

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 50
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGRO vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PGRO	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.69	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	2.35	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.29	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	2.89	-1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.11	7.40	-3.29

PGRO vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGRO and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PGRO vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGRO drawdown since its inception was -34.73%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRO and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGRO	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.73%	-68.28%	+33.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.34%	-8.64%	-7.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.31%	-15.58%	-7.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.73%	-20.29%	-14.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.34%	-6.12%	+1.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.21%	-15.94%	+5.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.05%	3.36%	+1.69%

Volatility

PGRO vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.42%. This indicates that PGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGRO	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.19%	5.42%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.19%	11.57%	+1.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.96%	14.82%	+2.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.93%	19.24%	+2.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.81%	24.68%	-2.87%

PGRO vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGRO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PGRO vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

PGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than ENFR's 4.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.08%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.08%	0.19%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGRO and ENFR in my portfolio?

PGRO and ENFR have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PGRO or ENFR?

PGRO has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to ENFR (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGRO dropped -34.73% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, PGRO or ENFR?

On 5-year performance, ENFR leads with 19.69% vs 12.34% for PGRO. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PGRO or ENFR?

Over the 5-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 19.69% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PGRO or ENFR?

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PGRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PGRO or ENFR?

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 0.02% for PGRO.

What is the main difference between PGRO and ENFR?

PGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PGRO and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.