PGRO vs. DFAU
PGRO (Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF) and DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while DFAU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PGRO returned 14.11%/yr vs 13.05%/yr for DFAU. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PGRO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DFAU.
Performance
PGRO vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGRO achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than DFAU's 11.32% return.
PGRO
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 6.31%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 8.47%
- 1Y
- 25.32%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- —
DFAU
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- —
PGRO vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 9.11% | 15.13% | 34.01% | 45.19% | -31.53% | 16.67% |
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 11.32% | 16.78% | 23.17% | 24.79% | -16.99% | 12.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGRO and DFAU is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PGRO and DFAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
PGRO vs. DFAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PGRO
DFAU
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
-
Technology
PGRO
DFAU
Communication Services
PGRO
DFAU
Consumer Cyclical
PGRO
DFAU
Industrials
PGRO
DFAU
Healthcare
PGRO
DFAU
Financial Services
PGRO
DFAU
Consumer Defensive
PGRO
DFAU
Basic Materials
PGRO
DFAU
Utilities
PGRO
DFAU
Real Estate
PGRO
DFAU
Energy
PGRO
-
DFAU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGRO vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank
PGRO
DFAU
PGRO vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGRO | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 2.38 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.20 | 3.24 | -1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.43 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 3.30 | -1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.12 | 15.10 | -9.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGRO | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.38 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.77 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.94 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
PGRO vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGRO drawdown since its inception was -34.73%, which is greater than DFAU's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRO and DFAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGRO | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.73% | -23.61% | -11.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.34% | -8.67% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.31% | -19.36% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.73% | -23.61% | -11.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -0.67% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -4.99% | -5.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 1.89% | +3.07% |
Volatility
PGRO vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) at 2.95%. This indicates that PGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGRO | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 2.95% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.28% | 9.04% | +3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.10% | 12.06% | +4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 17.02% | +4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 16.73% | +5.04% |
PGRO vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGRO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGRO vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison
PGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than DFAU's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 0.90% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 0.13% |
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.08% | 0.19% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGRO and DFAU have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGRO has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to DFAU (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGRO dropped -34.73% vs DFAU's -23.61%.
On 5-year performance, PGRO leads with 14.11% vs 13.05% for DFAU. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DFAU has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PGRO has performed better with a 14.11% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PGRO.
DFAU has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.02% for PGRO.
PGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DFAU is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PGRO and 0.12% for DFAU.
DFAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGRO and DFAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer