PGF vs. RBIL
PGF (Invesco Financial Preferred ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PGF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PGF returned 1.99% vs 4.20% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. PGF charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
PGF vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGF achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.66% return.
PGF
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 1.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- -1.04%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 4.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PGF vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | -0.06% | 1.20% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.66% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGF and RBIL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGF vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
PGF
RBIL
PGF vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PGF | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 2.20 | -1.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 7.57 | -7.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.52 | 32.59 | -32.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PGF vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGF drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGF and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGF | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -0.56% | -75.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.69% | -0.56% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.14% | -0.17% | -4.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -0.08% | -6.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 0.13% | +2.33% |
Volatility
PGF vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.33%. This indicates that PGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGF | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 0.33% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.01% | 0.86% | +3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.07% | 0.94% | +5.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.37% | 1.06% | +10.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.00% | 1.06% | +10.94% |
PGF vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGF vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
PGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than RBIL's 4.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | 6.33% | 6.30% | 6.24% | 6.15% | 5.95% | 4.68% | 4.91% | 5.14% | 5.73% | 5.32% | 5.92% | 5.68% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.37% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGF and RBIL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGF has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to RBIL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGF dropped -75.69% vs RBIL's -0.56%.
On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 4.20% vs 1.99% for PGF. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 4.20% return vs 1.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PGF.
PGF has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 4.37% for RBIL.
PGF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. PGF tracks Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PGF and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.54 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGF and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer