PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGF vs. PFFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGF vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGF achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly lower than PFFA's 3.08% return.


PGF

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-0.31%
6M
0.05%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
2.29%

PFFA

1D
-0.70%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
3.08%
6M
4.03%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGF vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PGF
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
-0.31%3.40%6.01%7.73%-19.22%2.65%7.23%14.55%-1.53%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
3.08%8.22%16.11%26.45%-20.91%23.53%-7.87%31.99%-7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PGF and PFFA is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.67

The correlation between PGF and PFFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

PGF vs. PFFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PGF
PFFA

Financial Services

100.0%
28.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Communication Services

-

5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

3.2%

Healthcare

-

0.9%

Industrials

-

10.2%

Real Estate

-

41.2%

Technology

-

3.0%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Financial Services

PGF
100.0%
PFFA
28.1%

Basic Materials

PGF

-

PFFA
0.3%

Communication Services

PGF

-

PFFA
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PGF

-

PFFA
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

PGF

-

PFFA

-

Energy

PGF

-

PFFA
3.2%

Healthcare

PGF

-

PFFA
0.9%

Industrials

PGF

-

PFFA
10.2%

Real Estate

PGF

-

PFFA
41.2%

Technology

PGF

-

PFFA
3.0%

Utilities

PGF

-

PFFA
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGF vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGF
PGF Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGF Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGF Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGF vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGFPFFADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

2.12

-1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

3.00

-1.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.40

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

2.29

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.11

7.79

-5.68

PGF vs. PFFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGF Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the PFFA Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGF and PFFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGFPFFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

2.12

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.57

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.24

-0.09

Drawdowns

PGF vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGF drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than PFFA's maximum drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGF and PFFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGFPFFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.69%

-70.52%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.69%

-6.49%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

-12.15%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.41%

-22.70%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.38%

-1.50%

-3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-6.65%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.90%

+0.30%

Volatility

PGF vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) is 1.48%, while Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) has a volatility of 1.87%. This indicates that PGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGFPFFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.87%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.06%

5.68%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.28%

7.02%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.36%

11.51%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.00%

31.84%

-19.84%

PGF vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGF vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison

PGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, less than PFFA's 9.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.62%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PGF
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
6.33%6.30%6.24%6.15%5.95%4.68%4.91%5.14%5.73%5.32%5.92%5.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGF and PFFA have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFA has higher volatility (1.87%) compared to PGF (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGF dropped -75.69% vs PFFA's -70.52%.

On 5-year performance, PFFA leads with 6.57% vs -0.81% for PGF. On fees, PGF is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, PGF has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFFA has performed better with a 6.57% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PGF is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.

PFFA has the higher dividend yield at 9.62%, compared with 6.33% for PGF.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PGF and 1.47% for PFFA.

PFFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGF and PFFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer