PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFA vs. PFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFA vs. PFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFA achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly higher than PFF's 0.89% return.


PFFA

1D
0.44%
1M
-0.04%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
1.20%
1Y
6.02%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.21%

PFF

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.03%
6M
-1.43%
YTD
0.89%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*
2.93%
ALL TIME*
3.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$85.47M$81.60M$92.33M
$15.74M$17.23M$20.45M

PFFA vs. PFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
1.20%8.22%16.11%26.45%-20.91%23.53%-7.87%31.99%-7.29%
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
0.89%4.87%7.24%9.22%-18.19%7.15%7.89%15.93%-3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFA and PFF is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

0.76

The correlation between PFFA and PFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFA vs. PFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

PFF
PFF Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFF Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFF Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFFA vs. PFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFAPFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.07

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

0.55

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.56

1.42

+1.14

PFFA vs. PFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFA Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the PFF Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFA and PFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFFA vs. PFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFA drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, which is greater than PFF's maximum drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFA and PFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFAPFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.52%

-65.55%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.49%

-5.28%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.15%

-10.63%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

-21.05%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.29%

-3.07%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-5.74%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.05%

+0.20%

Volatility

PFFA vs. PFF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) is 2.32%, while iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that PFFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFAPFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

2.60%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.46%

5.87%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.62%

7.31%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.59%

10.40%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.55%

12.70%

+18.85%

PFFA vs. PFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFA has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PFF's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFA vs. PFF - Dividend Comparison

PFFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.98%, more than PFF's 5.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
4.97%6.30%6.32%6.63%6.01%4.45%4.79%5.31%6.32%5.59%5.85%5.76%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.98%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFA and PFF have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFF has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to PFFA (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFA dropped -70.52% vs PFF's -65.55%.

On 5-year performance, PFFA leads with 5.57% vs 0.71% for PFF. On fees, PFF is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, PFFA has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFFA has performed better with a 5.57% return vs 0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFF is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.

PFFA has the higher dividend yield at 9.98%, compared with 4.97% for PFF.

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.47% for PFFA and 0.46% for PFF.

PFFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFA and PFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer