PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFA vs. PFXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFA vs. PFXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) and VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFA achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than PFXF's 5.24% return.


PFFA

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
2.26%
6M
1.93%
1Y
11.54%
3Y*
14.10%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*

PFXF

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
5.24%
6M
4.73%
1Y
15.10%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
5.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFA vs. PFXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
2.26%8.22%16.11%26.45%-20.91%23.53%-7.87%31.99%-7.29%
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
5.24%9.64%8.42%11.20%-18.83%11.61%7.61%20.52%-3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFA and PFXF is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

0.72

The correlation between PFFA and PFXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFA vs. PFXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PFXF
PFXF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PFXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PFXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFA vs. PFXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) and VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFAPFXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.60

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

8.59

-2.69

PFFA vs. PFXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the PFXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFA and PFXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFFA vs. PFXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFA drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, which is greater than PFXF's maximum drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFA and PFXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFAPFXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.52%

-35.49%

-35.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.49%

-5.83%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.15%

-11.90%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

-21.80%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-3.96%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.62%

-3.90%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.76%

+0.20%

Volatility

PFFA vs. PFXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) is 2.13%, while VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that PFFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFAPFXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

3.71%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.91%

7.33%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.16%

9.42%

-2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.54%

11.00%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.74%

13.25%

+18.49%

PFFA vs. PFXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFA has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PFXF's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFA vs. PFXF - Dividend Comparison

PFFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%, more than PFXF's 6.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.79%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
6.27%6.72%7.82%7.88%6.74%4.66%5.19%5.35%6.56%5.93%5.81%5.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFA and PFXF have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFXF has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to PFFA (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFA dropped -70.52% vs PFXF's -35.49%.

On 5-year performance, PFFA leads with 6.09% vs 3.74% for PFXF. On fees, PFXF is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, PFFA has been the lower-risk option at 2.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFFA has performed better with a 6.09% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFXF is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.

PFFA has the higher dividend yield at 9.79%, compared with 6.27% for PFXF.

They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.47% for PFFA and 0.41% for PFXF.

PFFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFA and PFXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer