PG vs. LPG
PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) and LPG (Dorian LPG Ltd.) are both stocks. PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while LPG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, PG returned 8.96%/yr vs 29.41%/yr for LPG. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PG vs. LPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than LPG's 94.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has underperformed LPG with an annualized return of 8.96%, while LPG has yielded a comparatively higher 29.41% annualized return.
PG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- -5.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
LPG
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- 14.01%
- YTD
- 94.53%
- 6M
- 93.10%
- 1Y
- 108.89%
- 3Y*
- 37.14%
- 5Y*
- 47.82%
- 10Y*
- 29.41%
PG vs. LPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.93% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
LPG Dorian LPG Ltd. | 94.53% | 9.75% | -37.80% | 171.42% | 109.62% | 12.71% | -21.25% | 165.52% | -29.08% | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PG and LPG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2014 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
PG:
$361.53B
LPG:
$1.93B
PG:
$5.23
LPG:
$4.54
PG:
28.63
LPG:
9.95
PG:
7.00
LPG:
0.15
PG:
4.20
LPG:
4.00
PG:
6.70
LPG:
1.69
PG:
$86.72B
LPG:
$481.51M
PG:
$43.64B
LPG:
$415.02M
PG:
$22.63B
LPG:
$279.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PG vs. LPG — Risk / Return Rank
PG
LPG
PG vs. LPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PG | LPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.42 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 4.38 | -4.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 9.39 | -10.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PG vs. LPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum LPG drawdown of -78.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and LPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PG | LPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.25% | -78.31% | +24.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -24.99% | +9.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -62.89% | +41.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -62.89% | +39.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | -62.89% | +39.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.29% | -5.30% | -7.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -42.68% | +30.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.80% | 11.64% | -2.84% |
Volatility
PG vs. LPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is 6.99%, while Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) has a volatility of 17.04%. This indicates that PG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PG | LPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 17.04% | -10.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.01% | 30.44% | -15.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.78% | 39.81% | -21.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 43.43% | -25.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 48.29% | -29.24% |
Dividends
PG vs. LPG - Dividend Comparison
PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than LPG's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPG Dorian LPG Ltd. | 6.53% | 10.07% | 16.41% | 9.12% | 29.02% | 7.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
PG vs. LPG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and Dorian LPG Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PG and LPG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LPG has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to PG (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs LPG's -78.31%.
LPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PG and LPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer