PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PG vs. UL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

PG vs. UL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and The Unilever Group (UL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%7,000.00%8,000.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7,756.05%
3,160.81%
PG
UL

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 18.63% return, which is significantly lower than UL's 22.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 9.78%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 6.93% annualized return.


PG

YTD

18.63%

1M

-0.97%

6M

2.59%

1Y

15.07%

5Y (annualized)

9.46%

10Y (annualized)

9.78%

UL

YTD

22.40%

1M

-8.42%

6M

6.51%

1Y

24.37%

5Y (annualized)

3.00%

10Y (annualized)

6.93%

Fundamentals


PGUL
Market Cap$390.56B$144.14B
EPS$5.79$2.82
PE Ratio28.6420.41
PEG Ratio3.5015.94
Total Revenue (TTM)$83.91B$60.29B
Gross Profit (TTM)$43.14B$25.86B
EBITDA (TTM)$22.32B$11.95B

Key characteristics


PGUL
Sharpe Ratio0.891.50
Sortino Ratio1.302.35
Omega Ratio1.181.30
Calmar Ratio1.551.42
Martin Ratio4.887.34
Ulcer Index2.82%3.26%
Daily Std Dev15.39%15.96%
Max Drawdown-54.23%-53.55%
Current Drawdown-4.03%-11.78%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between PG and UL is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PG vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PG, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.891.53
The chart of Sortino ratio for PG, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.302.40
The chart of Omega ratio for PG, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.181.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for PG, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.551.45
The chart of Martin ratio for PG, currently valued at 4.88, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.887.30
PG
UL

The current PG Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the UL Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PG and UL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.89
1.53
PG
UL

Dividends

PG vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than UL's 3.25% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.34%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.32%2.78%2.91%
UL
The Unilever Group
3.25%3.83%3.61%3.77%3.07%3.17%3.46%2.79%3.40%3.02%3.69%3.39%

Drawdowns

PG vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, roughly equal to the maximum UL drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and UL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.03%
-11.78%
PG
UL

Volatility

PG vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is 5.15%, while The Unilever Group (UL) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that PG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.15%
6.06%
PG
UL

Financials

PG vs. UL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and The Unilever Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items