PortfoliosLab logo
PG vs. UL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PG and UL is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PG vs. UL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and The Unilever Group (UL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PG:

0.08

UL:

1.11

Sortino Ratio

PG:

0.20

UL:

1.59

Omega Ratio

PG:

1.03

UL:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

PG:

0.09

UL:

1.32

Martin Ratio

PG:

0.21

UL:

2.78

Ulcer Index

PG:

5.30%

UL:

7.53%

Daily Std Dev

PG:

19.23%

UL:

18.92%

Max Drawdown

PG:

-54.23%

UL:

-53.55%

Current Drawdown

PG:

-6.67%

UL:

-2.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PG:

$386.31B

UL:

$153.33B

EPS

PG:

$6.30

UL:

$2.56

PE Ratio

PG:

26.15

UL:

24.39

PEG Ratio

PG:

3.95

UL:

3.02

PS Ratio

PG:

4.60

UL:

2.52

PB Ratio

PG:

7.43

UL:

6.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

PG:

$83.93B

UL:

$60.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PG:

$43.05B

UL:

$60.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

PG:

$23.39B

UL:

$13.01B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than UL's 13.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 10.59%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.


PG

YTD

0.04%

1M

-2.30%

6M

-1.78%

1Y

1.44%

3Y*

8.01%

5Y*

10.92%

10Y*

10.59%

UL

YTD

13.50%

1M

-0.03%

6M

11.22%

1Y

20.78%

3Y*

16.88%

5Y*

8.22%

10Y*

7.08%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


The Procter & Gamble Company

The Unilever Group

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PG vs. UL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PG is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PG is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PG is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PG is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PG is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PG is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

UL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UL is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UL is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UL is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UL is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UL is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UL is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PG vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PG Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the UL Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PG and UL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PG vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than UL's 3.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.46%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%2.78%
UL
The Unilever Group
3.06%3.29%3.83%3.61%3.77%3.07%3.17%3.46%2.79%3.40%3.02%3.69%

Drawdowns

PG vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, roughly equal to the maximum UL drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and UL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PG vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and The Unilever Group (UL) have volatilities of 6.36% and 6.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PG vs. UL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and The Unilever Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20212022202320242025
19.78B
29.64B
(PG) Total Revenue
(UL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PG vs. UL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Procter & Gamble Company and The Unilever Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
51.0%
100.0%
(PG) Gross Margin
(UL) Gross Margin
PG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.08B and revenue of 19.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.0%.

UL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 29.64B and revenue of 29.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

PG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.56B and revenue of 19.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.

UL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 3.45B and revenue of 29.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

PG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 3.77B and revenue of 19.78B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.

UL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 29.64B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.