PG vs. KMB
PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, PG returned 8.91%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for KMB. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PG vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 5.26% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 8.91%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.88% annualized return.
PG
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- -5.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
KMB
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- -20.54%
- 3Y*
- -5.52%
- 5Y*
- -1.25%
- 10Y*
- 0.88%
PG vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.26% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 2.25% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PG and KMB is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.48 |
The correlation between PG and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PG:
$359.26B
KMB:
$33.49B
PG:
$5.23
KMB:
$5.93
PG:
28.45
KMB:
16.96
PG:
6.96
KMB:
2.93
PG:
4.17
KMB:
2.03
PG:
6.66
KMB:
18.65
PG:
$86.72B
KMB:
$16.54B
PG:
$43.64B
KMB:
$5.93B
PG:
$22.63B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PG vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
PG
KMB
PG vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.86 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.70 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | -1.07 | +0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | -0.80 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | -0.06 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.04 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.47 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
PG vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.25% | -36.97% | -17.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -29.60% | +14.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -34.06% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -34.06% | +10.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | -34.06% | +10.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.84% | -27.79% | +13.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -8.84% | -3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.73% | 19.28% | -10.55% |
Volatility
PG vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is 7.43%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that PG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 9.00% | -1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.45% | 16.69% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.78% | 25.74% | -6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 20.19% | -2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 21.08% | -2.02% |
Dividends
PG vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than KMB's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 5.05% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.86% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
PG vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PG vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PG and KMB have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to PG (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs KMB's -36.97%.
PG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PG and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer