PG vs. KMB
PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock, while KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, PG returned 8.83%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for KMB. At 0.48, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PG vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's -1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 8.83%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.08% annualized return.
PG
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -5.99%
- YTD
- 3.06%
- 6M
- -1.23%
- 1Y
- -7.17%
- 3Y*
- 1.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- -16.04%
- 1Y
- -24.29%
- 3Y*
- -6.72%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- 0.08%
PG vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 3.06% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | -1.70% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PG and KMB is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984 | 0.48 |
The correlation between PG and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PG:
$355.50B
KMB:
$32.63B
PG:
$6.75
KMB:
$6.06
PG:
21.72
KMB:
16.15
PG:
5.31
KMB:
2.79
PG:
4.19
KMB:
1.90
PG:
6.67
KMB:
20.02
PG:
$85.26B
KMB:
$17.22B
PG:
$43.21B
KMB:
$6.13B
PG:
$23.62B
KMB:
$3.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PG vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
PG
KMB
PG vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | -0.98 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | -1.20 | +0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.83 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | -0.74 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | -1.27 | +0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 | -0.98 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | -0.15 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.00 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
PG vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and KMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.25% | -36.97% | -17.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -32.43% | +14.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -34.06% | +10.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | -34.06% | +10.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.64% | -30.59% | +14.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -8.75% | -3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.42% | 18.88% | -9.46% |
Volatility
PG vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is 5.71%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that PG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 8.02% | -2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.65% | 21.79% | -8.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.19% | 25.11% | -6.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 19.97% | -2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 20.92% | -2.06% |
Dividends
PG vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than KMB's 5.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.88% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 5.17% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
PG vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PG vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 11.37B and revenue of 22.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 4.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 5.37B and revenue of 22.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 507.00M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 4.33B and revenue of 22.21B, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 499.00M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.