PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFXF vs. HODL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFXF vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFXF achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -25.27% return.


PFXF

1D
-0.95%
1M
2.21%
YTD
8.54%
6M
9.54%
1Y
18.28%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
5.44%

HODL

1D
-2.79%
1M
-18.34%
YTD
-25.27%
6M
-29.73%
1Y
-38.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFXF vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
8.54%9.64%7.05%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-25.27%-6.42%99.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PFXF and HODL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.36

The correlation between PFXF and HODL shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFXF vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFXF
PFXF Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PFXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFXF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PFXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFXF vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFXFHODLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.86

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

-0.79

+3.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.08

-1.36

+12.45

PFXF vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFXF and HODL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFXFHODLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

-0.89

+2.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.30

+0.18

Drawdowns

PFXF vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFXF drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, smaller than the maximum HODL drawdown of -49.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFXF and HODL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFXFHODLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-49.25%

+13.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.83%

-49.25%

+43.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-47.93%

+46.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-15.97%

+12.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

28.35%

-26.70%

Volatility

PFXF vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) is 3.14%, while VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that PFXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFXFHODLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

9.43%

-6.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.89%

34.37%

-27.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.94%

43.51%

-34.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.91%

49.88%

-38.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

49.88%

-36.67%

PFXF vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFXF has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFXF vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

PFXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
6.08%6.72%7.82%7.88%6.74%4.66%5.19%5.35%6.56%5.93%5.81%5.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFXF and HODL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HODL has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to PFXF (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFXF dropped -35.49% vs HODL's -49.25%.

On 1-year performance, PFXF leads with 18.28% vs -38.56% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PFXF has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PFXF has performed better with a 18.28% return vs -38.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for PFXF.

PFXF has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.

PFXF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while HODL is Cryptocurrency. PFXF tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index, while HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for PFXF and 0.25% for HODL.

PFXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFXF and HODL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer