PFUT vs. TYLD
PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) and TYLD (Cambria Tactical Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFUT is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while TYLD is a fund fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFUT charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TYLD.
Performance
PFUT vs. TYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PFUT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TYLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFUT vs. TYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF | 2.26% | 2.22% | 17.96% |
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 1.84% | 4.05% | 5.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFUT and TYLD is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2024 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFUT vs. TYLD — Risk / Return Rank
PFUT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TYLD
PFUT vs. TYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFUT | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.53 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 32.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 123.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFUT vs. TYLD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFUT | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.10% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.03% | — |
Volatility
PFUT vs. TYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFUT | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.75% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 1.74% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 1.74% | — |
PFUT vs. TYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than TYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFUT vs. TYLD - Dividend Comparison
PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 3.73% | 4.38% | 4.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFUT and TYLD have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for PFUT.
TYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 0.00% for PFUT.
They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for PFUT and 0.59% for TYLD.
Find the right allocation for PFUT and TYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer