PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYLD vs. BALT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TYLD vs. BALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TYLD vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TYLD
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
0.80%4.05%5.15%
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
-0.13%6.65%10.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYLD achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than BALT's -0.13% return.


TYLD

1D
0.06%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.91%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BALT

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
1.97%
1Y
6.64%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TYLD vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TYLD vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYLD
TYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BALT
BALT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYLD vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TYLDBALTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.11

1.49

+1.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.72

2.29

+2.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.00

1.43

+0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.01

1.91

+6.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

34.71

12.79

+21.93

TYLD vs. BALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYLD Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is higher than the BALT Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYLD and BALT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TYLDBALTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

1.49

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.48

1.70

+0.77

Correlation

The correlation between TYLD and BALT is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TYLD vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison

TYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while BALT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024
TYLD
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
4.72%4.38%4.24%
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TYLD vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYLD drawdown since its inception was -1.06%, smaller than the maximum BALT drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLD and BALT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TYLDBALTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-4.89%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.52%

-3.48%

+2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.05%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-0.35%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

0.52%

-0.40%

Volatility

TYLD vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) is 0.24%, while Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) has a volatility of 0.61%. This indicates that TYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TYLDBALTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

0.61%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.50%

1.84%

-1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34%

4.48%

-3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.82%

3.36%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.82%

3.36%

-1.54%