PFUT vs. PCLN

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) and PCLN (Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF) are both Sustainable funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFUT charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for PCLN.

Performance

PFUT vs. PCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF (PCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PFUT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PCLN

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: -2.95%
• 6M: 18.17%
• YTD: 25.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFUT vs. PCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	2.26%	-4.24%
PCLN Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF	25.05%	-1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between PFUT and PCLN is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

PFUT vs. PCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF (PCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PFUT	PCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-12.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-6.94%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PFUT	PCLN	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	24.39%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	24.39%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	24.39%	—

PFUT vs. PCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than PCLN's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFUT vs. PCLN - Dividend Comparison

PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PCLN Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF	0.06%	0.08%	0.00%
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFUT and PCLN in my portfolio?

PFUT and PCLN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFUT or PCLN?

On fees, PFUT is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFUT or PCLN?

PFUT is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PCLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFUT or PCLN?

PCLN has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for PFUT.

What is the main difference between PFUT and PCLN?

They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and Pictet. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for PFUT and 0.70% for PCLN.