PCLN vs. PLDR
PCLN (Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF) and PLDR (Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF) are both Sustainable funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCLN charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PLDR.
Performance
PCLN vs. PLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCLN achieves a 27.02% return, which is significantly higher than PLDR's 1.69% return.
PCLN
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- 6M
- 24.66%
- YTD
- 27.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLDR
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -3.02%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 10.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.99%
- 10Y*
- —
PCLN vs. PLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCLN Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF | 27.02% | -1.27% |
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF | 1.69% | 3.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLN and PLDR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCLN vs. PLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF (PCLN) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCLN | PLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCLN vs. PLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLN drawdown since its inception was -12.34%, smaller than the maximum PLDR drawdown of -29.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLN and PLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLN | PLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.34% | -29.58% | +17.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.48% | -3.21% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -8.57% | +5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.40% | — |
Volatility
PCLN vs. PLDR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCLN | PLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.33% | 12.57% | +11.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 17.10% | +7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 17.04% | +7.29% |
PCLN vs. PLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PLDR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCLN vs. PLDR - Dividend Comparison
PCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while PLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCLN Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.38% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCLN and PLDR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLDR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLDR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PCLN.
PLDR has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.06% for PCLN.
They also come from different issuers: Pictet and Power Corporation of Canada. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for PCLN and 0.59% for PLDR.
Find the right allocation for PCLN and PLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer