PFUT vs. IBIC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFUT is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. PFUT is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. PFUT charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

PFUT vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PFUT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: 2.41%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 1Y: 4.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFUT vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	2.26%	2.22%	13.60%	12.77%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.55%	4.96%	5.25%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PFUT and IBIC is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	-0.06

The correlation between PFUT and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PFUT vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFUT vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFUT	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.63	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	8.25	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.10	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	15.70	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	53.10	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PFUT	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.90%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.08%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.10%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PFUT	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.91%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	1.56%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	1.56%	—

PFUT vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFUT vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	4.62%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFUT and IBIC in my portfolio?

PFUT and IBIC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFUT or IBIC?

On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFUT or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for PFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFUT or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.00% for PFUT.

What is the main difference between PFUT and IBIC?

PFUT is categorized as Sustainable, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for PFUT and 0.10% for IBIC.