PFDOX vs. PFSMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PFDOX (PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund) and PFSMX (PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - PFDOX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by The Pacific Financial Group, while PFSMX is a Global Equities fund managed by The Pacific Financial Group. Over the past 5 years, PFDOX returned -0.13%/yr vs 7.99%/yr for PFSMX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFDOX charges 2.03%/yr vs 2.05%/yr for PFSMX.

Performance

PFDOX vs. PFSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund (PFDOX) and PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFDOX achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than PFSMX's 7.49% return.

PFDOX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: -0.23%
• 6M: 0.02%
• 1Y: 4.97%
• 3Y*: 4.24%
• 5Y*: -0.13%
• 10Y*: —

PFSMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 6M: 8.37%
• 1Y: 15.30%
• 3Y*: 16.39%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFDOX vs. PFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PFDOX PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund	-0.23%	7.49%	2.02%	5.41%	-13.51%	-1.65%	5.76%	6.10%	-1.92%	0.10%
PFSMX PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund	7.49%	12.09%	20.94%	14.51%	-17.25%	17.56%	11.48%	27.08%	-8.20%	0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PFDOX and PFSMX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017	0.21

Over the past year, PFDOX and PFSMX have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PFDOX vs. PFSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFDOX

PFDOX Risk / Return Rank: 19
PFDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
PFDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
PFDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
PFDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
PFDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

PFSMX

PFSMX Risk / Return Rank: 29
PFSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
PFSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
PFSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
PFSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
PFSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFDOX vs. PFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund (PFDOX) and PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PFDOX	PFSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.51	-0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	2.16	-0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.28	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	1.96	-0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.59	8.12	-3.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PFDOX vs. PFSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFDOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the PFSMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFDOX and PFSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PFDOX	PFSMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	1.51	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	0.41	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.48	-0.29

Drawdowns

PFDOX vs. PFSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFDOX drawdown since its inception was -19.45%, smaller than the maximum PFSMX drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDOX and PFSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFDOX	PFSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.45%	-38.00%	+18.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.40%	-8.16%	+4.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.06%	-16.29%	+11.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.45%	-38.00%	+18.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.60%	0.00%	-3.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.00%	-10.71%	+4.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	1.97%	-0.86%

Volatility

PFDOX vs. PFSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund (PFDOX) is 1.49%, while PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX) has a volatility of 2.70%. This indicates that PFDOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFDOX	PFSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.49%	2.70%	-1.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.97%	8.24%	-5.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.79%	10.68%	-6.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.72%	19.45%	-13.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.84%	19.37%	-14.53%

PFDOX vs. PFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFDOX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PFSMX's 2.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFDOX vs. PFSMX - Dividend Comparison

PFDOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than PFSMX's 8.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PFDOX PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund	2.80%	2.79%	3.36%	2.91%	3.13%	3.66%	2.68%	2.29%	0.92%	0.18%
PFSMX PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund	8.86%	9.52%	17.36%	3.15%	20.83%	20.75%	3.02%	1.39%	1.72%	0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFDOX and PFSMX in my portfolio?

PFDOX and PFSMX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFDOX or PFSMX?

PFSMX has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to PFDOX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFDOX dropped -19.45% vs PFSMX's -38.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.