PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFDOX vs. PFADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFDOX vs. PFADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund (PFDOX) and PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFDOX achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly lower than PFADX's 3.38% return.


PFDOX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.70%
YTD
-0.12%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
-0.07%
10Y*

PFADX

1D
0.30%
1M
0.70%
YTD
3.38%
6M
3.38%
1Y
9.29%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
1.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFDOX vs. PFADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFDOX
PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund
-0.12%7.49%2.02%5.41%-13.51%-1.65%5.76%6.10%-1.92%0.10%
PFADX
PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund
3.38%7.07%2.13%3.69%-9.50%3.85%7.25%8.16%-5.20%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PFDOX and PFADX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017

0.67

The correlation between PFDOX and PFADX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.80 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFDOX vs. PFADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFDOX
PFDOX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PFDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PFDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

PFADX
PFADX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PFADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFADX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PFADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFADX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFDOX vs. PFADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund (PFDOX) and PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFDOXPFADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

2.60

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

9.10

-4.52

PFDOX vs. PFADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFDOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the PFADX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFDOX and PFADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFDOXPFADXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.21

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.24

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.42

-0.22

Drawdowns

PFDOX vs. PFADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFDOX drawdown since its inception was -19.45%, which is greater than PFADX's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDOX and PFADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFDOXPFADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.45%

-16.64%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.40%

-3.63%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.06%

-6.38%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.45%

-16.64%

-2.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.49%

-0.98%

-2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-5.30%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.04%

+0.07%

Volatility

PFDOX vs. PFADX - Volatility Comparison

PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund (PFDOX) and PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) have volatilities of 1.49% and 1.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFDOXPFADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

1.53%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

3.40%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

4.27%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.72%

5.86%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

5.54%

-0.70%

PFDOX vs. PFADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFDOX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PFADX's 2.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFDOX vs. PFADX - Dividend Comparison

PFDOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than PFADX's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFADX
PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund
2.38%2.46%2.89%1.04%5.33%3.46%0.08%1.51%0.91%0.52%
PFDOX
PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund
2.79%2.79%3.36%2.91%3.13%3.66%2.68%2.29%0.92%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFDOX and PFADX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFADX has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to PFDOX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFDOX dropped -19.45% vs PFADX's -16.64%.

PFADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFDOX and PFADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer