PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSI vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSI vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSI achieves a -35.82% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 33.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PFSI has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 20.94%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.97% annualized return.


PFSI

1D
1.88%
1M
-8.46%
YTD
-35.82%
6M
-35.81%
1Y
-9.22%
3Y*
10.89%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
20.94%

VGT

1D
1.27%
1M
19.95%
YTD
33.62%
6M
32.71%
1Y
65.14%
3Y*
34.15%
5Y*
23.05%
10Y*
25.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSI vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
-35.82%30.55%16.79%57.84%-17.58%7.69%95.33%60.72%-3.09%34.23%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
33.62%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSI and VGT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2013

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between PFSI and VGT has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSI vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSI
PFSI Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSI vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFSIVGTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.20

3.19

-3.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.06

3.88

-3.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.51

-0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

4.06

-4.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.45

13.01

-13.45

PFSI vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSI Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSI and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFSIVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

3.19

-3.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.92

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

1.06

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.68

-0.34

Drawdowns

PFSI vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSI drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSI and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSIVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.49%

-54.63%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.92%

-16.40%

-31.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.92%

-27.23%

-20.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.92%

-35.07%

-12.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.49%

-35.07%

-21.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.94%

0.00%

-46.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.15%

-7.95%

-9.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.59%

5.12%

+20.47%

Volatility

PFSI vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 5.98%. This indicates that PFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSIVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

5.98%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.17%

15.98%

+30.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.81%

20.52%

+25.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.46%

25.17%

+11.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.41%

24.60%

+14.81%

Dividends

PFSI vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

PFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than VGT's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
1.43%0.91%0.98%0.91%1.41%1.15%0.82%0.35%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.30%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFSI and VGT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFSI has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to VGT (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSI dropped -56.49% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSI and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer