PFSI vs. VGT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PFSI (PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, PFSI returned 20.84%/yr vs 25.49%/yr for VGT. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PFSI vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSI achieves a -38.72% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PFSI has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 20.84%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.49% annualized return.

PFSI

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -6.57%
• YTD: -38.72%
• 6M: -39.31%
• 1Y: -16.27%
• 3Y*: 7.05%
• 5Y*: 6.07%
• 10Y*: 20.84%

VGT

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 23.32%
• 6M: 21.50%
• 1Y: 46.82%
• 3Y*: 30.13%
• 5Y*: 19.51%
• 10Y*: 25.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSI vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PFSI PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.	-38.72%	30.55%	16.79%	57.84%	-17.58%	7.69%	95.33%	60.72%	-3.09%	34.23%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	23.32%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-29.70%	30.45%	46.04%	48.62%	2.46%	37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSI and VGT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2013	0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between PFSI and VGT has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PFSI vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSI

PFSI Risk / Return Rank: 29
PFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
PFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
PFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 27
PFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
PFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 32

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 58
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSI vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFSI	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	2.07	-2.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.14	2.61	-2.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.35	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.33	2.87	-3.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.58	8.76	-9.34

PFSI vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSI Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSI and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFSI vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSI drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSI and VGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFSI	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.49%	-54.63%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.77%	-16.40%	-33.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.77%	-27.23%	-22.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.77%	-35.07%	-14.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.49%	-35.07%	-21.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.34%	-7.71%	-41.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.28%	-7.95%	-9.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.04%	5.36%	+22.68%

Volatility

PFSI vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) is 9.05%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that PFSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFSI	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.05%	11.39%	-2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.61%	18.58%	+28.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.13%	22.72%	+23.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.57%	25.55%	+11.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.40%	24.77%	+14.63%

Dividends

PFSI vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

PFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PFSI PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.	1.50%	0.91%	0.98%	0.91%	1.41%	1.15%	0.82%	0.35%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.33%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFSI and VGT in my portfolio?

PFSI and VGT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFSI or VGT?

VGT has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to PFSI (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSI dropped -56.49% vs VGT's -54.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.