PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSI vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSI vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSI achieves a -42.41% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PFSI has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 20.63%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.06% annualized return.


PFSI

1D
-0.61%
1M
-9.66%
6M
-24.02%
YTD
-42.41%
1Y
-20.37%
3Y*
1.43%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
20.63%
ALL TIME*
12.20%

VGT

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.30%
6M
21.30%
YTD
20.36%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
24.06%
ALL TIME*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$57.90M$47.01M$49.12M
$440.89M$515.41M$573.34M

PFSI vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
-42.41%30.55%16.79%57.84%-17.58%7.69%95.33%60.72%-3.09%34.23%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
20.36%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSI and VGT is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2013

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between PFSI and VGT has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSI vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFSI
PFSI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFSI vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFSIVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.23

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

1.94

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

5.23

-5.80

PFSI vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSI Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSI and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFSI vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSI drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSI and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSIVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.49%

-54.63%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.39%

-16.40%

-35.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.39%

-27.23%

-25.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.39%

-35.07%

-17.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.49%

-35.07%

-21.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.39%

-9.93%

-42.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.53%

-7.95%

-9.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.98%

6.07%

+25.91%

Volatility

PFSI vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) has a higher volatility of 14.59% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 8.42%. This indicates that PFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSIVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.59%

8.42%

+6.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.54%

20.14%

+27.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.24%

24.28%

+22.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.05%

25.83%

+11.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.36%

24.89%

+14.47%

Dividends

PFSI vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

PFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
1.59%0.91%0.98%0.91%1.41%1.15%0.82%0.35%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFSI and VGT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFSI has higher volatility (14.59%) compared to VGT (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSI dropped -56.49% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSI and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer