PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSI vs. ABBV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PFSI vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSI achieves a -38.45% return, which is significantly lower than ABBV's -3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, PFSI has outperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 20.43%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively lower 17.56% annualized return.


PFSI

1D
-4.09%
1M
-10.02%
YTD
-38.45%
6M
-39.38%
1Y
-14.40%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
7.07%
10Y*
20.43%

ABBV

1D
0.80%
1M
4.31%
YTD
-3.41%
6M
-4.15%
1Y
19.73%
3Y*
20.88%
5Y*
18.44%
10Y*
17.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSI vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
-38.45%30.55%16.79%57.84%-17.58%7.69%95.33%60.72%-3.09%34.23%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
-3.41%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSI and ABBV is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2013

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PFSI:

$4.34B

ABBV:

$385.19B

EPS

PFSI:

$9.41

ABBV:

$2.05

PE Ratio

PFSI:

8.56

ABBV:

105.79

PS Ratio

PFSI:

1.23

ABBV:

6.13

PB Ratio

PFSI:

1.00

ABBV:

14.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

PFSI:

$3.54B

ABBV:

$62.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PFSI:

$2.50B

ABBV:

$46.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

PFSI:

$1.04B

ABBV:

$17.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSI vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSI
PFSI Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSI vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFSIABBVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.31

0.83

-1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.09

1.30

-1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.16

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

1.14

-1.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.56

2.57

-3.13

PFSI vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSI Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSI and ABBV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFSIABBVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

0.83

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.81

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.68

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.73

-0.39

Drawdowns

PFSI vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSI drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSI and ABBV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSIABBVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.49%

-45.09%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.11%

-17.32%

-31.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.11%

-20.74%

-28.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.11%

-21.92%

-27.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.49%

-45.09%

-11.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.11%

-9.04%

-40.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.16%

-10.73%

-6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.77%

7.69%

+18.08%

Volatility

PFSI vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) at 5.42%. This indicates that PFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSIABBVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

5.42%

+3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.33%

17.61%

+28.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.93%

23.96%

+21.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.51%

22.84%

+13.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.43%

25.74%

+13.69%

Dividends

PFSI vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

PFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than ABBV's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
3.10%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
1.49%0.91%0.98%0.91%1.41%1.15%0.82%0.35%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PFSI vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
544.98M
15.00B
(PFSI) Total Revenue
(ABBV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PFSI vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. and AbbVie Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
97.4%
83.5%
Portfolio components
PFSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 530.59M and revenue of 544.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.4%.

ABBV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

PFSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 293.10M and revenue of 544.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.8%.

ABBV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

PFSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. reported a net income of 82.32M and revenue of 544.98M, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.

ABBV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PFSI and ABBV have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFSI has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to ABBV (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSI dropped -56.49% vs ABBV's -45.09%.

ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSI and ABBV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer