PFFR vs. AMZA
PFFR (InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF) and AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFFR is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index, while AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. PFFR is passively managed, while AMZA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFFR returned 0.97%/yr vs 19.41%/yr for AMZA. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFFR charges 0.45%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for AMZA.
Performance
PFFR vs. AMZA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFR achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than AMZA's 22.22% return.
PFFR
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
AMZA
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 22.22%
- 6M
- 20.41%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
PFFR vs. AMZA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 0.80% | 5.36% | 7.12% | 21.04% | -23.90% | 6.76% | 0.19% | 20.28% | -7.45% | 7.60% |
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 22.22% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 33.20% | 51.22% | -49.25% | 6.27% | -26.78% | -10.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFR and AMZA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PFFR and AMZA has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PFFR vs. AMZA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFFR
AMZA
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
PFFR
AMZA
-
Financial Services
PFFR
AMZA
-
Basic Materials
PFFR
-
AMZA
-
Communication Services
PFFR
-
AMZA
-
Consumer Cyclical
PFFR
-
AMZA
-
Consumer Defensive
PFFR
-
AMZA
-
Energy
PFFR
-
AMZA
Healthcare
PFFR
-
AMZA
-
Industrials
PFFR
-
AMZA
-
Technology
PFFR
-
AMZA
-
Utilities
PFFR
-
AMZA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFR vs. AMZA — Risk / Return Rank
PFFR
AMZA
PFFR vs. AMZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFR | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 1.45 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.44 | 3.65 | -1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFR | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.00 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.76 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | -0.02 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
PFFR vs. AMZA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFR drawdown since its inception was -53.02%, smaller than the maximum AMZA drawdown of -91.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFR and AMZA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFR | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.02% | -91.46% | +38.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -12.16% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.16% | -18.56% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.80% | -25.15% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -10.19% | +7.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -45.02% | +38.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 4.82% | -2.02% |
Volatility
PFFR vs. AMZA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) is 2.81%, while InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that PFFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFR | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 5.80% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.14% | 13.40% | -7.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.91% | 17.72% | -9.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.47% | 25.84% | -15.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 37.25% | -16.71% |
PFFR vs. AMZA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZA's 2.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFR vs. AMZA - Dividend Comparison
PFFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, more than AMZA's 8.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 8.02% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 8.29% | 7.99% | 7.78% | 7.72% | 8.60% | 6.08% | 6.11% | 5.77% | 6.48% | 6.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFFR and AMZA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZA has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to PFFR (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFR dropped -53.02% vs AMZA's -91.46%.
On 5-year performance, AMZA leads with 19.41% vs 0.97% for PFFR. On fees, PFFR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PFFR has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 19.41% return vs 0.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.
PFFR has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 8.02% for AMZA.
PFFR is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while AMZA is MLPs. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PFFR and 2.01% for AMZA.
AMZA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFFR and AMZA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer