PFFA vs. PFLD
PFFA (Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF) and PFLD (AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. PFFA is actively managed, while PFLD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFFA returned 6.57%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PFLD. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFFA charges 1.47%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFLD.
Performance
PFFA vs. PFLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFA achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly higher than PFLD's 2.69% return.
PFFA
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 3.08%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 14.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- —
PFLD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- —
PFFA vs. PFLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 3.08% | 8.22% | 16.11% | 26.45% | -20.91% | 23.53% | -7.87% | 2.49% |
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 2.69% | 1.44% | 5.48% | 8.16% | -12.73% | 4.49% | 5.34% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFA and PFLD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PFFA and PFLD has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PFFA vs. PFLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFFA
PFLD
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Technology
-
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
PFFA
PFLD
-
Financial Services
PFFA
PFLD
-
Industrials
PFFA
PFLD
-
Communication Services
PFFA
PFLD
-
Energy
PFFA
PFLD
-
Technology
PFFA
PFLD
-
Utilities
PFFA
PFLD
Healthcare
PFFA
PFLD
-
Basic Materials
PFFA
PFLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
PFFA
PFLD
-
Consumer Defensive
PFFA
-
PFLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFA vs. PFLD — Risk / Return Rank
PFFA
PFLD
PFFA vs. PFLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFA | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.35 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.81 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 12.46 | -4.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFA | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 1.85 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.14 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.17 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
PFFA vs. PFLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFA drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, which is greater than PFLD's maximum drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFA and PFLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFA | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.52% | -33.20% | -37.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.49% | -2.23% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.15% | -6.41% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.70% | -15.51% | -7.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | 0.00% | -1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -4.17% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 0.50% | +1.40% |
Volatility
PFFA vs. PFLD - Volatility Comparison
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) has a higher volatility of 1.87% compared to AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) at 0.84%. This indicates that PFFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFA | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.87% | 0.84% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.68% | 2.26% | +3.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.02% | 3.39% | +3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 7.50% | +4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.84% | 13.38% | +18.46% |
PFFA vs. PFLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFA has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PFLD's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFA vs. PFLD - Dividend Comparison
PFFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.62%, more than PFLD's 5.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 9.62% | 9.47% | 9.18% | 9.56% | 10.75% | 7.64% | 8.54% | 10.02% | 5.15% |
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 5.60% | 6.52% | 7.09% | 7.09% | 5.76% | 4.52% | 4.79% | 0.82% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFFA and PFLD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFFA has higher volatility (1.87%) compared to PFLD (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFA dropped -70.52% vs PFLD's -33.20%.
On 5-year performance, PFFA leads with 6.57% vs 1.04% for PFLD. On fees, PFLD is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PFLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFFA has performed better with a 6.57% return vs 1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFLD is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.
PFFA has the higher dividend yield at 9.62%, compared with 5.60% for PFLD.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Advisors Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 1.47% for PFFA and 0.45% for PFLD.
PFFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFFA and PFLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer