PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFF vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFF vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFF achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PFF has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 3.35%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.


PFF

1D
0.16%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
2.40%
6M
2.42%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
6.77%
5Y*
1.32%
10Y*
3.35%

VYM

1D
0.80%
1M
3.01%
YTD
12.37%
6M
11.19%
1Y
24.69%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFF vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
2.40%4.87%7.24%9.22%-18.19%7.15%7.89%15.93%-4.64%8.10%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.37%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PFF and VYM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2007

0.53

The correlation between PFF and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PFF vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFF
VYM

Financial Services

51.6%
20.5%

Real Estate

10.5%
0.0%

Utilities

8.7%
5.7%

Industrials

5.6%
12.1%

Technology

4.9%
17.7%

Communication Services

3.4%
3.5%

Basic Materials

1.6%
3.5%

Healthcare

1.4%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
8.1%

Energy

0.4%
9.8%

Financial Services

PFF
51.6%
VYM
20.5%

Real Estate

PFF
10.5%
VYM
0.0%

Utilities

PFF
8.7%
VYM
5.7%

Industrials

PFF
5.6%
VYM
12.1%

Technology

PFF
4.9%
VYM
17.7%

Communication Services

PFF
3.4%
VYM
3.5%

Basic Materials

PFF
1.6%
VYM
3.5%

Healthcare

PFF
1.4%
VYM
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PFF
1.3%
VYM
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

PFF
1.2%
VYM
8.1%

Energy

PFF
0.4%
VYM
9.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFF vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFF
PFF Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFF Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFF Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFF vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.42

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

3.70

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.75

13.81

-9.06

PFF vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFF Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFF and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFF vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFF drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFF and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.55%

-56.98%

-8.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.28%

-6.69%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.63%

-14.46%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

-15.84%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

-35.21%

+1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-0.52%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.76%

-7.18%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

1.80%

-0.07%

Volatility

PFF vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) is 2.29%, while Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that PFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

3.31%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.21%

7.81%

-2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.88%

10.47%

-3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.32%

13.99%

-3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.67%

16.35%

-3.68%

PFF vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFF has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFF vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

PFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
5.50%6.30%6.32%6.63%6.01%4.45%4.79%5.31%6.32%5.59%5.85%5.76%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFF and VYM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYM has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to PFF (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFF dropped -65.55% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.95% vs 3.35% for PFF. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PFF has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PFF.

PFF has the higher dividend yield at 5.50%, compared with 2.19% for VYM.

PFF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while VYM is Dividend. PFF tracks ICE Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for PFF and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFF and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer