PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFDE vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFDE vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PFDE

1D
-3.11%
1M
0.37%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MTUM

1D
-5.95%
1M
2.44%
YTD
22.55%
6M
21.67%
1Y
33.50%
3Y*
31.72%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
16.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFDE vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PFDE and MTUM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFDE vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFDE

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFDE vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PFDE vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFDEMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

0.81

+0.62

Drawdowns

PFDE vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFDE drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDE and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFDEMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-34.08%

+23.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.75%

-6.99%

+3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-6.21%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

Volatility

PFDE vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFDEMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.30%

20.03%

-3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

20.77%

-4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

21.12%

-4.82%

PFDE vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFDE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFDE vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

PFDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than MTUM's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.64%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
PFDE
Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF
0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFDE and MTUM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PFDE.

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.11% for PFDE.

PFDE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFDE and 0.15% for MTUM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFDE and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer