PFDE vs. MTUM
PFDE (Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFDE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pathfinder, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. PFDE is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PFDE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
PFDE vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFDE achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 28.81% return.
PFDE
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 25.46%
- YTD
- 28.81%
- 1Y
- 37.17%
- 3Y*
- 32.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.53%
- 10Y*
- 16.62%
PFDE vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 13.09% | -0.91% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 28.81% | -0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFDE and MTUM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFDE vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
PFDE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MTUM
PFDE vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFDE | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFDE vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFDE drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDE and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFDE | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -34.08% | +23.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -6.79% | +6.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -6.19% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.30% | — |
Volatility
PFDE vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFDE | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 23.66% | -7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 21.52% | -5.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 21.50% | -5.09% |
PFDE vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFDE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFDE vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
PFDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than MTUM's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.58% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFDE and MTUM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PFDE.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.18% for PFDE.
PFDE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFDE and 0.15% for MTUM.
Find the right allocation for PFDE and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer