PFDE vs. BDGS
PFDE (Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFDE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pathfinder, while BDGS is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Bridges. Both are actively managed. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PFDE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.
Performance
PFDE vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFDE achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 4.35% return.
PFDE
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BDGS
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 4.35%
- 1Y
- 10.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.83K | $93.96K | $183.58K | |
| $528.63K | $1.08M | $814.95K |
PFDE vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 11.86% | -0.91% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 4.35% | -0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFDE and BDGS is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFDE vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
PFDE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDGS
PFDE vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFDE | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFDE vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFDE drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDE and BDGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFDE | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -9.12% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -2.03% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -0.69% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.12% | — |
Volatility
PFDE vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFDE | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 7.06% | +9.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 8.30% | +8.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 8.30% | +8.44% |
PFDE vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFDE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFDE vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
PFDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than BDGS's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.53% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% |
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFDE and BDGS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PFDE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PFDE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.
BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.18% for PFDE.
PFDE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BDGS is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFDE and 0.87% for BDGS.
Find the right allocation for PFDE and BDGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer