PFDE vs. BDGS
PFDE (Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFDE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.
Performance
PFDE vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PFDE
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDGS
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 13.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFDE vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 9.27% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 4.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFDE and BDGS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFDE vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
PFDE
BDGS
PFDE vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFDE | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 1.72 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
PFDE vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFDE drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDE and BDGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFDE | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -9.12% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -1.57% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -0.65% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.85% | — |
Volatility
PFDE vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFDE | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.30% | 6.12% | +10.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 8.21% | +8.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 8.21% | +8.09% |
PFDE vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFDE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFDE vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
PFDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than BDGS's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.53% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% |
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFDE and BDGS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PFDE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PFDE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.
BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.11% for PFDE.
They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFDE and 0.87% for BDGS.
Find the right allocation for PFDE and BDGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer