PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFDE vs. GXLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFDE vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PFDE

1D
-3.11%
1M
0.37%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GXLC

1D
-2.61%
1M
0.60%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFDE vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PFDE and GXLC is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFDE vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PFDE vs. GXLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFDEGXLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

1.30

+0.13

Drawdowns

PFDE vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFDE drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDE and GXLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFDEGXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-9.08%

-1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.75%

-2.88%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-1.50%

-0.54%

Volatility

PFDE vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFDEGXLCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.30%

13.63%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

13.63%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

13.63%

+2.67%

PFDE vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFDE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFDE vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

PFDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than GXLC's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
0.64%0.30%
PFDE
Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF
0.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PFDE and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PFDE.

GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.11% for PFDE.

They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFDE and 0.02% for GXLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFDE and GXLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer