PFDE vs. GXLC
PFDE (Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PFDE is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PFDE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.
Performance
PFDE vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PFDE
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFDE vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 9.27% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFDE and GXLC is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFDE vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFDE | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 1.30 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
PFDE vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFDE drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDE and GXLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFDE | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -9.08% | -1.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -2.88% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -1.50% | -0.54% |
Volatility
PFDE vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFDE | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.30% | 13.63% | +2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 13.63% | +2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 13.63% | +2.67% |
PFDE vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFDE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFDE vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison
PFDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than GXLC's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.64% | 0.30% |
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, PFDE and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PFDE.
GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.11% for PFDE.
They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFDE and 0.02% for GXLC.
Find the right allocation for PFDE and GXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer