PFDE vs. SCHX
PFDE (Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PFDE is actively managed, while SCHX is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PFDE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
PFDE vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFDE achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 11.12% return.
PFDE
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 21.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 15.15%
PFDE vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 13.09% | -0.91% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 11.12% | -0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFDE and SCHX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFDE vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
PFDE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHX
PFDE vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFDE | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFDE vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFDE drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDE and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFDE | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -34.33% | +23.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.34% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -3.96% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
PFDE vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFDE | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 12.64% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 17.23% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 18.13% | -1.72% |
PFDE vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFDE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFDE vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
PFDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than SCHX's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, PFDE and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PFDE.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.18% for PFDE.
They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFDE and 0.03% for SCHX.
Find the right allocation for PFDE and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer