PFDE vs. FNDX
PFDE (Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFDE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pathfinder, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. PFDE is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFDE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
PFDE vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PFDE
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 31.89%
- 3Y*
- 20.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.60%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
PFDE vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 9.27% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 13.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFDE and FNDX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFDE vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
PFDE
FNDX
PFDE vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFDE | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.79 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
PFDE vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFDE drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDE and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFDE | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -37.72% | +27.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -1.66% | -2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -3.55% | +1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
PFDE vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFDE | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.30% | 10.36% | +5.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 15.19% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 17.50% | -1.20% |
PFDE vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFDE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFDE vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
PFDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than FNDX's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFDE and FNDX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PFDE.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.11% for PFDE.
PFDE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFDE and 0.25% for FNDX.
Find the right allocation for PFDE and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer