PFDE vs. FNDX
PFDE (Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFDE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pathfinder, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. PFDE is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFDE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
PFDE vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFDE achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 16.34% return.
PFDE
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 13.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.06%
PFDE vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 13.09% | -0.91% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 16.34% | -0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFDE and FNDX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFDE vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
PFDE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FNDX
PFDE vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFDE | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFDE vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFDE drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDE and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFDE | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -37.72% | +27.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | 0.00% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -3.54% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.57% | — |
Volatility
PFDE vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFDE | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 10.33% | +6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 15.13% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 17.43% | -1.02% |
PFDE vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFDE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFDE vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
PFDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than FNDX's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.47% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFDE and FNDX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PFDE.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.18% for PFDE.
PFDE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFDE and 0.25% for FNDX.
Find the right allocation for PFDE and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer