PEZ vs. ULVM
PEZ (Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF) and ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - PEZ tracks the DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index while ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PEZ returned 2.63%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for ULVM. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEZ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ULVM.
Performance
PEZ vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than ULVM's 14.84% return.
PEZ
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.46%
ULVM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
PEZ vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF | -4.23% | 5.40% | 20.06% | 29.55% | -29.59% | 20.35% | 38.97% | 18.05% | -6.85% | 5.07% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.84% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEZ and ULVM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.76 |
The correlation between PEZ and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
PEZ vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEZ
ULVM
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEZ
ULVM
Communication Services
PEZ
ULVM
Consumer Defensive
PEZ
ULVM
Healthcare
PEZ
ULVM
Technology
PEZ
ULVM
Industrials
PEZ
ULVM
Real Estate
PEZ
ULVM
Financial Services
PEZ
ULVM
Basic Materials
PEZ
-
ULVM
Energy
PEZ
-
ULVM
Utilities
PEZ
-
ULVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEZ vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank
PEZ
ULVM
PEZ vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEZ | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 2.71 | -2.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.54 | 3.82 | -3.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.47 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 4.50 | -4.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.91 | 18.64 | -17.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEZ | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 2.71 | -2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.74 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.58 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
PEZ vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, which is greater than ULVM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and ULVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEZ | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.39% | -40.71% | -17.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.83% | -6.47% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -18.14% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.72% | -19.77% | -21.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.25% | -0.13% | -11.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -5.75% | -8.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 1.56% | +4.40% |
Volatility
PEZ vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.96%. This indicates that PEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEZ | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 2.96% | +1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.13% | 7.97% | +7.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 10.74% | +9.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 15.48% | +9.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 18.86% | +6.20% |
PEZ vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEZ vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison
PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than ULVM's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.60% | 0.43% | 0.23% | 0.39% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.42% | 0.83% | 0.64% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEZ and ULVM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEZ has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs ULVM's -40.71%.
On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 2.63% for PEZ. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.
ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.22% for PEZ.
PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEZ and 0.20% for ULVM.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEZ and ULVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer