PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEZ vs. ULVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEZ vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than ULVM's 14.84% return.


PEZ

1D
0.45%
1M
0.97%
YTD
-4.23%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
9.46%

ULVM

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.70%
YTD
14.84%
6M
14.92%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEZ vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
-4.23%5.40%20.06%29.55%-29.59%20.35%38.97%18.05%-6.85%5.07%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
14.84%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%3.51%22.08%-12.07%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PEZ and ULVM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.76

The correlation between PEZ and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

PEZ vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PEZ
ULVM

Consumer Cyclical

66.0%
5.3%

Communication Services

11.9%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
4.7%

Healthcare

6.9%
10.1%

Technology

4.0%
13.1%

Industrials

3.8%
12.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
8.7%

Financial Services

0.6%
22.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.1%

Energy

-

3.4%

Utilities

-

12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PEZ
66.0%
ULVM
5.3%

Communication Services

PEZ
11.9%
ULVM
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

PEZ
8.7%
ULVM
4.7%

Healthcare

PEZ
6.9%
ULVM
10.1%

Technology

PEZ
4.0%
ULVM
13.1%

Industrials

PEZ
3.8%
ULVM
12.2%

Real Estate

PEZ
1.9%
ULVM
8.7%

Financial Services

PEZ
0.6%
ULVM
22.5%

Basic Materials

PEZ

-

ULVM
4.1%

Energy

PEZ

-

ULVM
3.4%

Utilities

PEZ

-

ULVM
12.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEZ vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEZ
PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEZ vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEZULVMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

2.71

-2.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.54

3.82

-3.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.47

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

4.50

-4.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.91

18.64

-17.73

PEZ vs. ULVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the ULVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEZ and ULVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEZULVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

2.71

-2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.74

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.58

-0.26

Drawdowns

PEZ vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, which is greater than ULVM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and ULVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEZULVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.39%

-40.71%

-17.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-6.47%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.48%

-18.14%

-13.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.72%

-19.77%

-21.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.25%

-0.13%

-11.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-5.75%

-8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.96%

1.56%

+4.40%

Volatility

PEZ vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.96%. This indicates that PEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEZULVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

2.96%

+1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.13%

7.97%

+7.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

10.74%

+9.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

15.48%

+9.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

18.86%

+6.20%

PEZ vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEZ vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison

PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than ULVM's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
0.22%0.11%0.12%0.60%0.43%0.23%0.39%0.01%0.40%0.42%0.83%0.64%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.58%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEZ and ULVM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEZ has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs ULVM's -40.71%.

On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 2.63% for PEZ. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.

ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.22% for PEZ.

PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEZ and 0.20% for ULVM.

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEZ and ULVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer