PEX vs. VFH
PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - PEX tracks the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index while VFH tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEX returned 4.92%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for VFH. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEX charges 3.13%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFH.
Performance
PEX vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEX achieves a -7.84% return, which is significantly lower than VFH's 5.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PEX has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 4.92%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.
PEX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- 6M
- -10.07%
- YTD
- -7.84%
- 1Y
- -14.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.32%
- 10Y*
- 4.92%
VFH
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 11.52%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.37%
PEX vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -7.84% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 5.27% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEX and VFH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2013 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PEX and VFH shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PEX vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEX
VFH
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PEX
VFH
Industrials
PEX
VFH
Healthcare
PEX
VFH
Basic Materials
PEX
VFH
-
Communication Services
PEX
-
VFH
Consumer Cyclical
PEX
-
VFH
Consumer Defensive
PEX
-
VFH
-
Energy
PEX
-
VFH
-
Real Estate
PEX
-
VFH
Technology
PEX
-
VFH
Utilities
PEX
-
VFH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEX vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
PEX
VFH
PEX vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEX | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.14 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 0.78 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 2.03 | -3.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEX vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEX drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEX and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEX | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -78.61% | +29.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.72% | -14.75% | -9.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.72% | -17.30% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | -25.66% | -10.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.17% | -44.42% | -4.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.70% | 0.00% | -16.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -18.46% | +10.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.93% | 5.69% | +8.24% |
Volatility
PEX vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) have volatilities of 3.97% and 3.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEX | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 3.97% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.62% | 11.35% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 14.94% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 19.20% | -1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 22.46% | -3.21% |
PEX vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEX has a 3.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEX vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
PEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.61%, more than VFH's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 8.61% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.67% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEX and VFH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFH has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to PEX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEX dropped -49.17% vs VFH's -78.61%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 13.37% vs 4.92% for PEX. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX has the higher dividend yield at 8.61%, compared with 1.67% for VFH.
PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 3.13% for PEX and 0.09% for VFH.
VFH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEX and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer