PEX vs. VFH
PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - PEX tracks the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index while VFH tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEX returned 4.55%/yr vs 13.40%/yr for VFH. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEX charges 3.13%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFH.
Performance
PEX vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEX achieves a -14.36% return, which is significantly lower than VFH's -1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, PEX has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 4.55%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return.
PEX
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- YTD
- -14.36%
- 6M
- -13.55%
- 1Y
- -16.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- -1.33%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
VFH
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 6.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
PEX vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -14.36% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -1.19% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEX and VFH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2013 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PEX and VFH shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PEX vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEX
VFH
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PEX
VFH
Industrials
PEX
VFH
Healthcare
PEX
VFH
Basic Materials
PEX
VFH
-
Communication Services
PEX
-
VFH
Consumer Cyclical
PEX
-
VFH
Consumer Defensive
PEX
-
VFH
-
Energy
PEX
-
VFH
-
Real Estate
PEX
-
VFH
Technology
PEX
-
VFH
Utilities
PEX
-
VFH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEX vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
PEX
VFH
PEX vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEX | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.08 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 0.44 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 1.13 | -2.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEX vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEX drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEX and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEX | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -78.61% | +29.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.72% | -14.75% | -9.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.72% | -17.30% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | -25.66% | -10.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.17% | -44.42% | -4.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.60% | -4.19% | -18.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -18.50% | +10.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.14% | 5.68% | +7.46% |
Volatility
PEX vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 4.33%. This indicates that PEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEX | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 4.33% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 11.44% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 14.93% | +1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 19.25% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 22.50% | -3.20% |
PEX vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEX has a 3.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEX vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
PEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.10%, more than VFH's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 13.10% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.48% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEX and VFH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to VFH (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEX dropped -49.17% vs VFH's -78.61%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 13.40% vs 4.55% for PEX. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 13.40% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX has the higher dividend yield at 13.10%, compared with 1.48% for VFH.
PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 3.13% for PEX and 0.09% for VFH.
VFH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEX and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer