PEX vs. CEFS
PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and CEFS (Saba Closed-End Funds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEX is a Financials Equities fund tracking the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while CEFS is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. PEX is passively managed, while CEFS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PEX returned -0.25%/yr vs 13.56%/yr for CEFS. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PEX charges 3.13%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for CEFS.
Performance
PEX vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEX achieves a -6.82% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's 12.11% return.
PEX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- 6M
- -7.02%
- YTD
- -6.82%
- 1Y
- -10.44%
- 3Y*
- 4.37%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- 4.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.23%
CEFS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- 6M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 20.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.21M | $2.18M | $2.24M | |
| $46.71K | $56.13K | $56.35K |
PEX vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -6.82% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 2.92% |
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 12.11% | 16.67% | 23.48% | 20.99% | -7.08% | 17.86% | 3.40% | 28.41% | -9.97% | 7.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEX and CEFS is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017 | 0.52 |
The correlation between PEX and CEFS shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEX vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank
PEX
CEFS
PEX vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEX | CEFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.33 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 3.51 | -4.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 12.10 | -13.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEX vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEX drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, which is greater than CEFS's maximum drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEX and CEFS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEX | CEFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -38.99% | -10.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.09% | -5.67% | -15.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.72% | -13.37% | -11.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | -16.85% | -19.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.79% | -3.10% | -12.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.34% | -3.63% | -4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.79% | 1.64% | +9.15% |
Volatility
PEX vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) at 3.20%. This indicates that PEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEX | CEFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 3.20% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 9.43% | +3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 10.90% | +4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 13.23% | +4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 15.30% | +3.96% |
PEX vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEX has a 3.13% expense ratio, which is higher than CEFS's 2.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEX vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison
PEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.52%, more than CEFS's 7.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 7.28% | 7.84% | 8.79% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 10.73% | 8.61% | 8.10% | 10.43% | 5.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 8.52% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEX and CEFS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to CEFS (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEX dropped -49.17% vs CEFS's -38.99%.
On 5-year performance, CEFS leads with 13.56% vs -0.25% for PEX. On fees, CEFS is cheaper at 2.61% per year. On volatility, CEFS has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CEFS has performed better with a 13.56% return vs -0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CEFS is cheaper with a 2.61% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX has the higher dividend yield at 8.52%, compared with 7.28% for CEFS.
PEX is categorized as Financials Equities, while CEFS is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 3.13% for PEX and 2.61% for CEFS.
CEFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEX and CEFS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer