PETS vs. RLGT
PETS (PetMed Express, Inc.) and RLGT (Radiant Logistics, Inc.) are both stocks. PETS operates in Pharmaceutical Retailers (Healthcare), while RLGT operates in Integrated Freight & Logistics (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PETS returned -17.93%/yr vs 10.53%/yr for RLGT. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PETS vs. RLGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PETS achieves a -42.19% return, which is significantly lower than RLGT's 45.34% return. Over the past 10 years, PETS has underperformed RLGT with an annualized return of -17.93%, while RLGT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.
PETS
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -17.04%
- YTD
- -42.19%
- 6M
- -37.07%
- 1Y
- -48.18%
- 3Y*
- -49.51%
- 5Y*
- -42.21%
- 10Y*
- -17.93%
RLGT
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 10.98%
- YTD
- 45.34%
- 6M
- 37.72%
- 1Y
- 54.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
PETS vs. RLGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PETS PetMed Express, Inc. | -42.19% | -33.61% | -36.24% | -54.76% | -25.83% | -18.17% | 41.49% | 6.52% | -47.35% | 102.05% |
RLGT Radiant Logistics, Inc. | 45.34% | -5.52% | 0.90% | 30.45% | -30.18% | 25.69% | 4.13% | 31.06% | -7.61% | 17.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between PETS and RLGT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2006 | 0.16 |
The correlation between PETS and RLGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PETS:
$38.91M
RLGT:
$446.58M
PETS:
-$2.74
RLGT:
$0.33
PETS:
0.22
RLGT:
0.50
PETS:
1.34
RLGT:
1.91
PETS:
$179.02M
RLGT:
$893.50M
PETS:
$50.22M
RLGT:
$113.69M
PETS:
-$46.12M
RLGT:
$27.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PETS vs. RLGT — Risk / Return Rank
PETS
RLGT
PETS vs. RLGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) and Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PETS | RLGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.27 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 3.01 | -3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 6.51 | -7.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PETS vs. RLGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PETS drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than RLGT's maximum drawdown of -92.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PETS and RLGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PETS | RLGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.29% | -92.68% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.80% | -17.44% | -42.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.82% | -36.53% | -52.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.84% | -43.29% | -51.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.40% | -56.67% | -39.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.84% | 0.00% | -95.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.38% | -32.86% | -11.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.97% | 8.06% | +25.91% |
Volatility
PETS vs. RLGT - Volatility Comparison
PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) has a higher volatility of 22.35% compared to Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) at 7.86%. This indicates that PETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PETS | RLGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.35% | 7.86% | +14.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.97% | 31.32% | +38.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.42% | 38.41% | +60.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.24% | 38.48% | +25.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.86% | 44.12% | +18.74% |
Dividends
PETS vs. RLGT - Dividend Comparison
Neither PETS nor RLGT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PETS PetMed Express, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.90% | 6.78% | 4.67% | 3.46% | 4.59% | 4.47% | 1.74% | 3.25% | 4.14% |
RLGT Radiant Logistics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PETS vs. RLGT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PetMed Express, Inc. and Radiant Logistics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PETS vs. RLGT - Profitability Comparison
PETS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.23M and revenue of 42.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.
RLGT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PETS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported an operating income of -32.95M and revenue of 42.82M, resulting in an operating margin of -77.0%.
RLGT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.55M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
PETS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported a net income of -4.06M and revenue of 42.82M, resulting in a net margin of -9.5%.
RLGT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 4.67M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PETS and RLGT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PETS has higher volatility (22.35%) compared to RLGT (7.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PETS dropped -98.29% vs RLGT's -92.68%.
RLGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PETS and RLGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer