PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEJ vs. XRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEJ vs. XRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEJ achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly higher than XRT's -1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PEJ has underperformed XRT with an annualized return of 6.63%, while XRT has yielded a comparatively higher 8.58% annualized return.


PEJ

1D
0.88%
1M
3.84%
YTD
2.55%
6M
5.77%
1Y
16.68%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
6.63%

XRT

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
-1.80%
6M
-1.47%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
-0.80%
10Y*
8.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEJ vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEJ
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF
2.55%17.78%25.08%15.73%-25.37%22.78%-10.29%13.82%-9.31%11.22%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
-1.80%8.07%11.78%21.53%-31.64%42.60%41.91%14.12%-8.04%4.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PEJ and XRT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.75

The correlation between PEJ and XRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

PEJ vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PEJ
XRT

Consumer Cyclical

59.7%
73.6%

Communication Services

23.3%
1.4%

Industrials

10.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
20.9%

Technology

4.2%
1.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

1.4%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

1.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

PEJ
59.7%
XRT
73.6%

Communication Services

PEJ
23.3%
XRT
1.4%

Industrials

PEJ
10.2%
XRT

-

Consumer Defensive

PEJ
6.8%
XRT
20.9%

Technology

PEJ
4.2%
XRT
1.4%

Basic Materials

PEJ

-

XRT

-

Energy

PEJ

-

XRT
1.4%

Financial Services

PEJ

-

XRT

-

Healthcare

PEJ

-

XRT
1.4%

Real Estate

PEJ

-

XRT

-

Utilities

PEJ

-

XRT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEJ vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEJ
PEJ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PEJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PEJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XRT
XRT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEJ vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEJXRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.09

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

0.70

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

1.61

+2.61

PEJ vs. XRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the XRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEJ and XRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEJXRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.46

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

-0.03

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.32

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.35

-0.02

Drawdowns

PEJ vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, roughly equal to the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and XRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEJXRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.03%

-65.81%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.29%

-13.53%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.75%

-25.62%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.44%

-44.57%

+9.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.96%

-47.02%

-11.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-13.66%

+11.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-15.00%

+2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

5.87%

-1.90%

Volatility

PEJ vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) is 5.87%, while SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that PEJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEJXRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

6.43%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

13.62%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.49%

20.34%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.79%

26.90%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

27.15%

-2.41%

PEJ vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEJ vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison

PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than XRT's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEJ
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF
0.39%0.24%0.40%0.46%0.43%0.34%0.92%0.39%0.78%0.68%0.68%0.52%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
0.83%0.77%1.52%1.40%2.15%1.55%1.01%1.57%1.51%1.52%1.36%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEJ and XRT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XRT has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to PEJ (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEJ dropped -66.03% vs XRT's -65.81%.

On 10-year performance, XRT leads with 8.58% vs 6.63% for PEJ. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PEJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XRT has performed better with a 8.58% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PEJ.

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.39% for PEJ.

PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PEJ and 0.35% for XRT.

PEJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEJ and XRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer