PEJ vs. SPHQ
PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEJ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEJ returned 6.63%/yr vs 15.04%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEJ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
PEJ vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEJ achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PEJ has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 6.63%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.
PEJ
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 16.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.63%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.67%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
PEJ vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 2.55% | 17.78% | 25.08% | 15.73% | -25.37% | 22.78% | -10.29% | 13.82% | -9.31% | 11.22% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.16% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEJ and SPHQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2005 | 0.71 |
The correlation between PEJ and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
PEJ vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEJ
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEJ
SPHQ
Communication Services
PEJ
SPHQ
Industrials
PEJ
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
PEJ
SPHQ
Technology
PEJ
SPHQ
Basic Materials
PEJ
-
SPHQ
Energy
PEJ
-
SPHQ
Financial Services
PEJ
-
SPHQ
Healthcare
PEJ
-
SPHQ
Real Estate
PEJ
-
SPHQ
-
Utilities
PEJ
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEJ vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PEJ
SPHQ
PEJ vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEJ | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.32 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.67 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 11.39 | -7.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEJ | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.89 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.90 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.84 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.53 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
PEJ vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, which is greater than SPHQ's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEJ | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.03% | -57.83% | -8.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -8.90% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.75% | -16.57% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.44% | -25.04% | -10.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.96% | -31.60% | -27.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | 0.00% | -1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -10.70% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 2.08% | +1.89% |
Volatility
PEJ vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 3.33%. This indicates that PEJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEJ | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 3.33% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 10.18% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.49% | 12.62% | +5.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 16.45% | +6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 17.86% | +6.88% |
PEJ vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEJ vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than SPHQ's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 0.39% | 0.24% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.52% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEJ and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEJ has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to SPHQ (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEJ dropped -66.03% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.04% vs 6.63% for PEJ. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.04% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PEJ.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.39% for PEJ.
PEJ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PEJ and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEJ and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer