PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEJ vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEJ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEJ achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return. Over the past 10 years, PEJ has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 6.63%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.84% annualized return.


PEJ

1D
0.88%
1M
3.84%
YTD
2.55%
6M
5.77%
1Y
16.68%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
6.63%

QQQ

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.66%
YTD
20.71%
6M
19.19%
1Y
40.74%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
17.86%
10Y*
21.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEJ vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEJ
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF
2.55%17.78%25.08%15.73%-25.37%22.78%-10.29%13.82%-9.31%11.22%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PEJ and QQQ is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2005

0.70

The correlation between PEJ and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PEJ vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PEJ
QQQ

Consumer Cyclical

59.7%
12.3%

Communication Services

23.3%
15.8%

Industrials

10.2%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
7.7%

Technology

4.2%
53.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PEJ
59.7%
QQQ
12.3%

Communication Services

PEJ
23.3%
QQQ
15.8%

Industrials

PEJ
10.2%
QQQ
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

PEJ
6.8%
QQQ
7.7%

Technology

PEJ
4.2%
QQQ
53.8%

Basic Materials

PEJ

-

QQQ
1.1%

Energy

PEJ

-

QQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

PEJ

-

QQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

PEJ

-

QQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

PEJ

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

PEJ

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEJ vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEJ
PEJ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PEJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PEJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEJ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEJQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.44

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.42

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

13.14

-8.93

PEJ vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEJ and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEJQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

2.57

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.80

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.98

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.41

-0.08

Drawdowns

PEJ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEJQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.03%

-82.97%

+16.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.29%

-11.96%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.75%

-22.77%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.44%

-35.12%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.96%

-35.12%

-23.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-0.74%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-32.78%

+20.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

3.11%

+0.86%

Volatility

PEJ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.51%. This indicates that PEJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEJQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

4.51%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

12.10%

+1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.49%

15.94%

+2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.79%

22.37%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

22.29%

+2.45%

PEJ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEJ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEJ
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF
0.39%0.24%0.40%0.46%0.43%0.34%0.92%0.39%0.78%0.68%0.68%0.52%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEJ and QQQ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEJ has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to QQQ (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEJ dropped -66.03% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.84% vs 6.63% for PEJ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.84% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PEJ.

PEJ and QQQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.39%.

PEJ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PEJ and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEJ and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer