MAC vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Macerich Company (MAC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MAC or ET.
Key characteristics
| MAC | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 34.61% | 35.42% |
| 1Y Return | 101.07% | 42.22% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.36% | 34.68% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.74% | 19.62% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -6.20% | 2.38% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.49 | 2.76 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.02 | 3.90 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.40 | 1.50 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.22 | 1.86 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.75 | 22.78 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.60% | 1.91% |
| Daily Std Dev | 40.66% | 15.77% |
| Max Drawdown | -93.38% | -87.81% |
| Current Drawdown | -64.05% | -0.35% |
Fundamentals
| MAC | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.74B | $59.03B |
| EPS | $0.36 | $1.36 |
| PE Ratio | 55.86 | 12.68 |
| PEG Ratio | -485.00 | 0.55 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $882.39M | $83.66B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $626.79M | $14.03B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $360.92M | $12.39B |
Correlation
The correlation between MAC and ET is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MAC vs. ET - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MAC having a 34.61% return and ET slightly higher at 35.42%. Over the past 10 years, MAC has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -6.20%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 2.38% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MAC vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macerich Company (MAC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MAC vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
MAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than ET's 7.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAC Macerich Company | 3.38% | 4.41% | 5.51% | 3.47% | 10.78% | 11.14% | 6.86% | 4.37% | 3.88% | 9.06% | 3.01% | 4.01% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.40% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% | 3.19% |
Drawdowns
MAC vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAC drawdown since its inception was -93.38%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAC and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MAC vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Macerich Company (MAC) has a higher volatility of 8.20% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.25%. This indicates that MAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MAC vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Macerich Company and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities