MAC vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Macerich Company (MAC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Performance
MAC vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MAC vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAC Macerich Company | 3.32% | -3.72% | 34.48% | 45.69% | -31.57% | 68.49% | -56.69% | -32.18% | -30.56% | -2.81% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 19.24% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Fundamentals
MAC:
$4.85B
ET:
$70.45B
MAC:
-$0.77
ET:
$1.37
MAC:
4.75
ET:
0.84
MAC:
$1.01B
ET:
$82.63B
MAC:
$967.36M
ET:
$18.01B
MAC:
$637.82M
ET:
$14.93B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAC achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 19.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MAC has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -8.61%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 20.51% annualized return.
MAC
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -6.82%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 5.76%
- 1Y
- 14.35%
- 3Y*
- 26.91%
- 5Y*
- 14.63%
- 10Y*
- -8.61%
ET
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 19.24%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.52%
- 5Y*
- 29.51%
- 10Y*
- 20.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAC vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
MAC
ET
MAC vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macerich Company (MAC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAC | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 0.51 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.79 | 0.86 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.12 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 0.65 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.79 | 1.82 | -0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAC | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 0.51 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 1.17 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.18 | 0.56 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.36 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between MAC and ET is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MAC vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
MAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than ET's 6.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAC Macerich Company | 3.60% | 3.68% | 3.41% | 4.41% | 5.51% | 3.47% | 10.78% | 11.14% | 6.86% | 4.37% | 3.88% | 5.74% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.87% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
Drawdowns
MAC vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAC drawdown since its inception was -93.29%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAC and ET.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAC | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.29% | -87.81% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.24% | -17.33% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.71% | -25.82% | -37.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.91% | -72.82% | -20.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.19% | -1.88% | -62.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.39% | -25.95% | -3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.36% | 6.24% | +2.12% |
Volatility
MAC vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Macerich Company (MAC) has a higher volatility of 10.60% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.96%. This indicates that MAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MAC | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.60% | 4.96% | +5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.43% | 11.68% | +9.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.17% | 23.80% | +14.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.76% | 25.48% | +16.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.67% | 36.63% | +12.04% |
Financials
MAC vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Macerich Company and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities