PDP vs. JMOM
PDP (Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - PDP tracks the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index while JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PDP returned 11.32%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for JMOM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PDP charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.
Performance
PDP vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDP achieves a 24.95% return, which is significantly higher than JMOM's 22.79% return.
PDP
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 24.95%
- 6M
- 24.18%
- 1Y
- 37.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 22.79%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 36.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- —
PDP vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 24.95% | 8.37% | 26.06% | 20.88% | -24.49% | 7.72% | 36.59% | 33.13% | -5.96% | 1.75% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.79% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDP and JMOM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between PDP and JMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
PDP vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PDP
JMOM
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
PDP
JMOM
Technology
PDP
JMOM
Healthcare
PDP
JMOM
Energy
PDP
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
PDP
JMOM
Financial Services
PDP
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
PDP
JMOM
Basic Materials
PDP
JMOM
Communication Services
PDP
JMOM
Utilities
PDP
JMOM
Real Estate
PDP
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDP vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
PDP
JMOM
PDP vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDP | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.45 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 4.69 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 22.24 | -11.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDP | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.58 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.88 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.82 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
PDP vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDP drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDP and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDP | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.34% | -34.31% | -25.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -7.87% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.79% | -19.51% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.91% | -28.26% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.17% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -6.32% | -4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 1.66% | +1.68% |
Volatility
PDP vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) at 4.62%. This indicates that PDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDP | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 4.62% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.34% | 11.55% | +5.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.94% | 14.32% | +7.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.00% | 18.65% | +3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 20.13% | +1.46% |
PDP vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDP has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDP vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than JMOM's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.25% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.81% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, PDP and JMOM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PDP has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to JMOM (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDP dropped -59.34% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.28% vs 11.32% for PDP. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 11.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.
JMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.11% for PDP.
PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PDP and 0.12% for JMOM.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDP and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer