PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDP vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDP vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDP achieves a 24.25% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 30.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PDP has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 13.54%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.19% annualized return.


PDP

1D
1.79%
1M
5.69%
YTD
24.25%
6M
24.30%
1Y
36.64%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
13.54%

MTUM

1D
2.87%
1M
14.36%
YTD
30.37%
6M
31.51%
1Y
40.75%
3Y*
34.28%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
17.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDP vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
24.25%8.37%26.06%20.88%-24.49%7.72%36.59%33.13%-5.96%23.30%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
30.37%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PDP and MTUM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013

0.90

The correlation between PDP and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

PDP vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDP
MTUM

Industrials

39.2%
15.6%

Technology

26.9%
44.4%

Healthcare

6.5%
6.9%

Energy

6.3%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
3.6%

Financial Services

4.4%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.3%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.7%

Communication Services

2.2%
7.4%

Utilities

1.6%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.8%

Industrials

PDP
39.2%
MTUM
15.6%

Technology

PDP
26.9%
MTUM
44.4%

Healthcare

PDP
6.5%
MTUM
6.9%

Energy

PDP
6.3%
MTUM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PDP
5.5%
MTUM
3.6%

Financial Services

PDP
4.4%
MTUM
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

PDP
3.8%
MTUM
3.3%

Basic Materials

PDP
2.3%
MTUM
1.7%

Communication Services

PDP
2.2%
MTUM
7.4%

Utilities

PDP
1.6%
MTUM
1.6%

Real Estate

PDP
1.3%
MTUM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDP vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDP
PDP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDP Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDP vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDPMTUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.68

2.15

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.27

2.92

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

3.63

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.16

14.50

-3.34

PDP vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDP Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDP and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDPMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.15

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.74

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.82

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.84

-0.39

Drawdowns

PDP vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDP drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDP and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDPMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.34%

-34.08%

-25.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.87%

-11.54%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.79%

-20.99%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-32.28%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.70%

-34.08%

-0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-6.21%

-4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.89%

+0.45%

Volatility

PDP vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) is 6.50%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that PDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDPMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

7.73%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.42%

16.49%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.94%

19.03%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.00%

20.59%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

21.04%

+0.55%

PDP vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDP has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDP vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.11%0.17%0.15%0.42%0.45%0.00%0.11%0.25%0.18%0.28%0.81%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDP and MTUM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to PDP (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDP dropped -59.34% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.19% vs 13.54% for PDP. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PDP has been the lower-risk option at 6.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.19% return vs 13.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.11% for PDP.

PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PDP and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDP and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer