PDP vs. EEMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PDP (Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) and EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PDP tracks the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index while EEMO tracks the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PDP returned 13.60%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for EEMO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PDP charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EEMO.

Performance

PDP vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDP achieves a 24.95% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 40.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PDP has outperformed EEMO with an annualized return of 13.60%, while EEMO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.88% annualized return.

PDP

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 6.22%
• YTD: 24.95%
• 6M: 24.18%
• 1Y: 37.20%
• 3Y*: 24.44%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

EEMO

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 18.59%
• YTD: 40.25%
• 6M: 41.33%
• 1Y: 57.41%
• 3Y*: 25.30%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: 8.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDP vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF	24.95%	8.37%	26.06%	20.88%	-24.49%	7.72%	36.59%	33.13%	-5.96%	23.30%
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	40.25%	10.99%	9.88%	13.90%	-18.73%	-5.57%	9.66%	21.17%	-17.24%	49.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PDP and EEMO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012	0.47

The correlation between PDP and EEMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PDP vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PDP	EEMO
Industrials	39.2%	11.5%
Technology	26.9%	43.8%
Healthcare	6.5%	3.0%
Energy	6.3%	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.5%	3.2%
Financial Services	4.4%	18.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	1.2%
Basic Materials	2.3%	12.9%
Communication Services	2.2%	1.5%
Utilities	1.6%	2.0%
Real Estate	1.3%	0.5%

Return for Risk

PDP vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDP

PDP Risk / Return Rank: 53
PDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
PDP Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PDP Martin Ratio Rank: 61

EEMO

EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 75
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDP vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PDP	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.36	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	3.28	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.46	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	3.91	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.16	15.67	-4.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PDP vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDP Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDP and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PDP	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	2.36	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.37	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.41	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.13	+0.32

Drawdowns

PDP vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDP drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, which is greater than EEMO's maximum drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDP and EEMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDP	EEMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.34%	-48.47%	-10.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.87%	-14.75%	+2.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.79%	-26.06%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.91%	-34.03%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.70%	-46.57%	+11.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.32%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.61%	-20.17%	+9.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	3.67%	-0.33%

Volatility

PDP vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) is 6.51%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that PDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDP	EEMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	14.32%	-7.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.34%	22.10%	-4.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.94%	24.45%	-2.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.00%	19.33%	+2.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.59%	21.59%	0.00%

PDP vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDP has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDP vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than EEMO's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	1.64%	2.31%	2.57%	3.65%	3.82%	1.51%	1.53%	2.13%	13.10%	5.13%	1.55%	2.92%
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF	0.11%	0.17%	0.15%	0.42%	0.45%	0.00%	0.11%	0.25%	0.18%	0.28%	0.81%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDP and EEMO in my portfolio?

PDP and EEMO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PDP or EEMO?

EEMO has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to PDP (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDP dropped -59.34% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

Which ETF is better, PDP or EEMO?

On 10-year performance, PDP leads with 13.60% vs 8.88% for EEMO. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, PDP has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PDP or EEMO?

Over the 10-year period, PDP has performed better with a 13.60% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PDP or EEMO?

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PDP or EEMO?

EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.11% for PDP.

What is the main difference between PDP and EEMO?

PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PDP and 0.31% for EEMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.