PDEC vs. PAUG
PDEC (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December) and PAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - PDEC tracks the S&P 500 while PAUG tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PDEC returned 8.60%/yr vs 9.17%/yr for PAUG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
PDEC vs. PAUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDEC achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly higher than PAUG's 4.92% return.
PDEC
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 6.10%
- 1Y
- 17.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.60%
- 10Y*
- —
PAUG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 4.92%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- 14.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- —
PDEC vs. PAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December | 5.69% | 12.91% | 9.46% | 17.43% | -5.95% | 9.59% | 8.45% | 1.58% |
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August | 4.92% | 12.34% | 15.37% | 17.71% | -6.85% | 7.58% | 9.82% | 1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDEC and PAUG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between PDEC and PAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
PDEC vs. PAUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PDEC
PAUG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PDEC
PAUG
Financial Services
PDEC
PAUG
Communication Services
PDEC
PAUG
Consumer Cyclical
PDEC
PAUG
Healthcare
PDEC
PAUG
Industrials
PDEC
PAUG
Consumer Defensive
PDEC
PAUG
Energy
PDEC
PAUG
Utilities
PDEC
PAUG
Real Estate
PDEC
PAUG
Basic Materials
PDEC
PAUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDEC vs. PAUG — Risk / Return Rank
PDEC
PAUG
PDEC vs. PAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDEC | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.58 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 3.80 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.75 | 20.75 | -2.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDEC | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.69 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 1.06 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.88 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
PDEC vs. PAUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDEC drawdown since its inception was -19.31%, which is greater than PAUG's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDEC and PAUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDEC | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.31% | -17.88% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.78% | -3.96% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.77% | -10.45% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.53% | -11.76% | +0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.06% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -1.81% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.72% | +0.20% |
Volatility
PDEC vs. PAUG - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) at 0.58%. This indicates that PDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDEC | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 0.58% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.94% | 4.18% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.75% | 5.60% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.90% | 8.71% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 10.60% | +0.36% |
PDEC vs. PAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PDEC and PAUG have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
PDEC vs. PAUG - Dividend Comparison
Neither PDEC nor PAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% |
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, PDEC and PAUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PDEC has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to PAUG (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDEC dropped -19.31% vs PAUG's -17.88%.
On 5-year performance, PAUG leads with 9.17% vs 8.60% for PDEC. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAUG has performed better with a 9.17% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PDEC and PAUG have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
PDEC and PAUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PDEC tracks S&P 500, while PAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index.
PAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDEC and PAUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer