PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDEC vs. BDEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PDEC vs. BDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PDEC vs. BDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December
-2.03%12.91%9.46%17.43%-5.95%9.59%8.45%1.58%
BDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December
-3.15%14.96%12.71%19.86%-9.42%15.45%13.39%2.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDEC achieves a -2.03% return, which is significantly higher than BDEC's -3.15% return.


PDEC

1D
1.82%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
-2.03%
6M
1.14%
1Y
13.03%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*

BDEC

1D
2.08%
1M
-3.63%
YTD
-3.15%
6M
0.15%
1Y
14.68%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PDEC vs. BDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PDEC and BDEC have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

PDEC vs. BDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDEC
PDEC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BDEC
BDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDEC vs. BDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDECBDECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

1.10

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

1.66

+0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.67

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.01

8.36

+1.65

PDEC vs. BDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the BDEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDEC and BDEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDECBDECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.10

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.71

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.70

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between PDEC and BDEC is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PDEC vs. BDEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither PDEC nor BDEC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PDEC vs. BDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDEC drawdown since its inception was -19.31%, smaller than the maximum BDEC drawdown of -25.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDEC and BDEC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PDECBDECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.31%

-25.60%

+6.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-9.02%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.53%

-16.44%

+4.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-4.57%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-3.12%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

1.81%

-0.48%

Volatility

PDEC vs. BDEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) is 3.21%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that PDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PDECBDECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

3.90%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.38%

7.20%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

13.46%

-3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.87%

11.94%

-3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.07%

14.40%

-3.33%