PDEC vs. DIVO
PDEC (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PDEC is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. PDEC is passively managed, while DIVO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PDEC returned 8.69%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for DIVO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PDEC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
PDEC vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PDEC having a 5.92% return and DIVO slightly higher at 6.11%.
PDEC
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 5.92%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- 18.00%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 6.82%
- 1Y
- 19.19%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- —
PDEC vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December | 5.92% | 12.91% | 9.46% | 17.43% | -5.95% | 9.59% | 8.45% | 1.58% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.11% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDEC and DIVO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between PDEC and DIVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
PDEC vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PDEC
DIVO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
PDEC
DIVO
Financial Services
PDEC
DIVO
Communication Services
PDEC
DIVO
Consumer Cyclical
PDEC
DIVO
Healthcare
PDEC
DIVO
Industrials
PDEC
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
PDEC
DIVO
Energy
PDEC
DIVO
Utilities
PDEC
DIVO
Real Estate
PDEC
DIVO
-
Basic Materials
PDEC
DIVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDEC vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
PDEC
DIVO
PDEC vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDEC | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.68 | 2.15 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.94 | 3.19 | +0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.38 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 3.37 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.06 | 12.19 | +7.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDEC | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 2.15 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.91 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.85 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
PDEC vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDEC drawdown since its inception was -19.31%, smaller than the maximum DIVO drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDEC and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDEC | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.31% | -30.04% | +10.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.78% | -5.95% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.77% | -12.12% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.53% | -13.72% | +2.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.28% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -2.61% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 1.64% | -0.72% |
Volatility
PDEC vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) is 1.08%, while Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that PDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDEC | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 2.23% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.94% | 6.94% | -2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.75% | 8.97% | -2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.90% | 11.93% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 14.84% | -3.88% |
PDEC vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDEC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDEC vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
PDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.38% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% |
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDEC and DIVO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVO has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to PDEC (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDEC dropped -19.31% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.81% vs 8.69% for PDEC. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PDEC has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 8.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PDEC.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.38%, compared with 0.00% for PDEC.
PDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PDEC and 0.56% for DIVO.
PDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDEC and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer