PCRIX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
PCRIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 27, 2002. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
PCRIX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCRIX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRIX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund | 21.42% | 17.05% | 10.59% | -68.64% | 8.94% | 33.35% | 0.79% | 12.29% | -13.77% | 2.71% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCRIX achieves a 21.42% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PCRIX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of -1.99%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
PCRIX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 8.03%
- YTD
- 21.42%
- 6M
- 24.33%
- 1Y
- 28.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- -8.11%
- 10Y*
- -1.99%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCRIX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCRIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCRIX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
PCRIX
SCHG
PCRIX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCRIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 0.76 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 1.24 | +0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.17 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 1.09 | +2.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.52 | 3.71 | +5.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCRIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 0.76 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.57 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | 0.79 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.79 | -0.91 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCRIX and SCHG is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PCRIX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
PCRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRIX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund | 4.18% | 5.61% | 8.34% | 16.19% | 46.23% | 22.74% | 1.56% | 4.00% | 5.94% | 8.14% | 0.91% | 5.29% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
PCRIX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCRIX drawdown since its inception was -88.17%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRIX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCRIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.17% | -34.59% | -53.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.49% | -16.41% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.15% | -34.59% | -43.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.15% | -34.59% | -43.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.56% | -12.51% | -68.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.60% | -5.22% | -46.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 4.84% | -1.69% |
Volatility
PCRIX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that PCRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCRIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 6.77% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 12.54% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 22.45% | -5.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.75% | 22.31% | +13.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 21.51% | +5.66% |