PCRIX vs. DCMSX
PCRIX (PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund) and DCMSX (DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, PCRIX returned 7.47%/yr vs 6.58%/yr for DCMSX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PCRIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for DCMSX.
Performance
PCRIX vs. DCMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCRIX achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly lower than DCMSX's 21.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PCRIX has outperformed DCMSX with an annualized return of 7.47%, while DCMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.58% annualized return.
PCRIX
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -8.02%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 6M
- 14.72%
- 1Y
- 23.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.64%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
DCMSX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- 21.44%
- 6M
- 21.44%
- 1Y
- 26.83%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.16%
- 10Y*
- 6.58%
PCRIX vs. DCMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRIX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund | 16.94% | 17.05% | 10.59% | -5.91% | 8.94% | 33.35% | 0.79% | 12.29% | -13.77% | 2.71% |
DCMSX DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio | 21.44% | 15.15% | 5.90% | -9.14% | 11.36% | 33.54% | -1.78% | 7.96% | -11.22% | 2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCRIX and DCMSX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2010 | 0.96 |
The correlation between PCRIX and DCMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCRIX vs. DCMSX — Risk / Return Rank
PCRIX
DCMSX
PCRIX vs. DCMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX) and DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCRIX | DCMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.29 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 2.47 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 8.70 | -0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCRIX vs. DCMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCRIX drawdown since its inception was -82.24%, which is greater than DCMSX's maximum drawdown of -60.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRIX and DCMSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCRIX | DCMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.24% | -60.94% | -21.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -10.63% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.06% | -11.10% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.44% | -27.93% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.07% | -32.52% | -6.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.82% | -10.63% | -33.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.95% | -31.70% | -16.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 3.18% | -0.28% |
Volatility
PCRIX vs. DCMSX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX) and DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX) have volatilities of 3.89% and 4.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCRIX | DCMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.89% | 4.08% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.27% | 14.28% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.47% | 16.43% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 16.25% | +3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 14.47% | +2.63% |
PCRIX vs. DCMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCRIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMSX's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCRIX vs. DCMSX - Dividend Comparison
PCRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.36%, more than DCMSX's 8.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCMSX DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio | 8.68% | 10.75% | 2.83% | 2.52% | 7.46% | 49.44% | 0.37% | 1.51% | 1.63% | 3.09% | 0.47% | 0.15% |
PCRIX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund | 10.36% | 5.61% | 8.34% | 6.57% | 46.23% | 22.74% | 1.56% | 4.00% | 5.94% | 8.14% | 0.91% | 5.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, PCRIX and DCMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DCMSX has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to PCRIX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCRIX dropped -82.24% vs DCMSX's -60.94%.
DCMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCRIX and DCMSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer