PCLN vs. PFUT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PCLN (Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF) and PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) are both Sustainable funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCLN charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for PFUT.

Performance

PCLN vs. PFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF (PCLN) and Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PCLN

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -4.91%
• 6M: 15.57%
• YTD: 23.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PFUT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLN vs. PFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCLN Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF	23.64%	-1.27%
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	2.26%	-4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLN and PFUT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

PCLN vs. PFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF (PCLN) and Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PCLN	PFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.99%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.76%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCLN	PFUT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.32%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.32%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.32%	—	—

PCLN vs. PFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PFUT's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCLN vs. PFUT - Dividend Comparison

PCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PCLN Pictet Cleaner Planet ETF	0.06%	0.08%	0.00%
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCLN and PFUT in my portfolio?

PCLN and PFUT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCLN or PFUT?

On fees, PFUT is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCLN or PFUT?

PFUT is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PCLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCLN or PFUT?

PCLN has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for PFUT.

What is the main difference between PCLN and PFUT?

They also come from different issuers: Pictet and Power Corporation of Canada. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for PCLN and 0.64% for PFUT.