PCLG vs. HLAL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PCLG (Polen Focus Growth ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. PCLG is actively managed, while HLAL is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCLG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.

Performance

PCLG vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLG achieves a -6.70% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.

PCLG

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: -6.70%
• 6M: -7.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HLAL

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 9.45%
• YTD: 18.72%
• 6M: 17.75%
• 1Y: 43.63%
• 3Y*: 22.04%
• 5Y*: 15.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLG vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF	-6.70%	-1.09%
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	18.72%	4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLG and HLAL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

PCLG vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLAL

HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 88
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCLG vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCLG	HLAL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.64	0.89	-1.53

Drawdowns

PCLG vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLG drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, smaller than the maximum HLAL drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLG and HLAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCLG	HLAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.78%	-33.57%	+9.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.20%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.80%	-0.07%	-10.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.68%	-5.00%	-4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCLG	HLAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.70%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.74%	13.17%	+4.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.74%	17.60%	+0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.74%	20.21%	-2.47%

PCLG vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCLG vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison

PCLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than HLAL's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	0.44%	0.53%	0.58%	0.72%	1.15%	0.78%	0.97%	0.72%
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF	0.04%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCLG and HLAL in my portfolio?

PCLG and HLAL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCLG or HLAL?

On fees, PCLG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCLG or HLAL?

PCLG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCLG or HLAL?

HLAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.04% for PCLG.

What is the main difference between PCLG and HLAL?

They also come from different issuers: Polen and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PCLG and 0.50% for HLAL.