PCLC vs. TDVG

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

PCLC (Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

PCLC vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF (PCLC) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PCLC

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -4.70%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDVG

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 2.06%
• 6M: 7.74%
• YTD: 10.35%
• 1Y: 17.46%
• 3Y*: 14.85%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLC vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PCLC Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF	-2.07%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLC and TDVG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026	0.47

Return for Risk

PCLC vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 69
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCLC vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF (PCLC) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCLC	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.82	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.62	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.42	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.99	—

Drawdowns

PCLC vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLC drawdown since its inception was -9.52%, smaller than the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLC and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCLC	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.52%	-19.20%	+9.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.24%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.51%	-0.60%	-7.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-3.69%	+0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.75%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCLC	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.95%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.91%	9.66%	+22.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.91%	13.90%	+18.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.91%	13.84%	+18.07%

PCLC vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PCLC and TDVG have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

PCLC vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

PCLC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PCLC Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.97%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCLC and TDVG in my portfolio?

PCLC and TDVG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCLC or TDVG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCLC or TDVG?

PCLC and TDVG have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCLC or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for PCLC.

What is the main difference between PCLC and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Polen and T. Rowe Price.