PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLC vs. PCSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCLC vs. PCSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF (PCLC) and Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PCLC

1D
-1.83%
1M
-4.00%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCSG

1D
-3.77%
1M
-5.56%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLC vs. PCSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PCLC and PCSG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCLC vs. PCSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF (PCLC) and Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PCLC vs. PCSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCLC vs. PCSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLC drawdown since its inception was -9.52%, which is greater than PCSG's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLC and PCSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLCPCSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-9.02%

-0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-7.24%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-2.57%

-0.56%

Volatility

PCLC vs. PCSG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLCPCSGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.27%

37.20%

-4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.27%

37.20%

-4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.27%

37.20%

-4.93%

PCLC vs. PCSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PCSG's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCLC vs. PCSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither PCLC nor PCSG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PCLC and PCSG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PCLC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PCLC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PCSG.

PCLC and PCSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PCLC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PCSG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PCLC and 0.60% for PCSG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCLC and PCSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer